Abstract:Recent algorithmic advances have made directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure learning scalable for causal discovery. Yet, the currently available techniques assume a completely homogeneous population, precluding their application to clustered data where cluster-specific variations (e.g., patient-specific effects) are common. We address this issue by introducing a new approach that estimates a global structure while accounting for local cluster-level effects. The key idea is to extend the fixed- and random-effects framework of classical mixed models to the structure learning setting. Towards this end, we present a differentiable graph coupling mechanism that guarantees the union of the fixed- and random-effects graphs remains acyclic. Computationally, we provide a provably convergent first-order method and leverage efficient batched updates across clusters. Statistically, we establish identifiability of the model and show that our approach recovers the true structure asymptotically. In experiments on real and synthetic data, our proposal detects dependencies missed by alternative estimators, underscoring its value for structure learning in clustered settings.
Abstract:Rapid advancements in collection and dissemination of multi-platform molecular and genomics data has resulted in enormous opportunities to aggregate such data in order to understand, prevent, and treat human diseases. While significant improvements have been made in multi-omic data integration methods to discover biological markers and mechanisms underlying both prognosis and treatment, the precise cellular functions governing these complex mechanisms still need detailed and data-driven de-novo evaluations. We propose a framework called Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Genomic Data (fiBAG), that allows simultaneous identification of upstream functional evidence of proteogenomic biomarkers and the incorporation of such knowledge in Bayesian variable selection models to improve signal detection. fiBAG employs a conflation of Gaussian process models to quantify (possibly non-linear) functional evidence via Bayes factors, which are then mapped to a novel calibrated spike-and-slab prior, thus guiding selection and providing functional relevance to the associations with patient outcomes. Using simulations, we illustrate how integrative methods with functional calibration have higher power to detect disease related markers than non-integrative approaches. We demonstrate the profitability of fiBAG via a pan-cancer analysis of 14 cancer types to identify and assess the cellular mechanisms of proteogenomic markers associated with cancer stemness and patient survival.