It's All Connected: Topology-Aware Structural Graph Encoding Improves Performance on Polymer Prediction

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved strong results in molecular property prediction, but polymers present distinct challenges: labeled datasets are scarce and small (typically in the order of hundreds of polymers) due to the need for expensive experimentation, and complex polymer chain distributions influence polymer properties. Established practice in polymer prediction represents polymers solely by graphs of their repeat units, discarding the chain-scale morphology that governs key properties such as the glass transition temperature ($T_g$). In this work, we propose a principled graph construction that addresses this gap. Given a polymer's molecular mass distribution (MMD), we sample representative chains from the Schulz-Zimm distribution and construct representative sets of large graphs encoding chain-scale topology directly, with atoms and bonds featurized using rich chemical descriptors. We further pretrain GNN encoders via masked graph modeling on 100,000 unlabeled PSMILES strings before fine-tuning on labeled data. On a dataset of 381 polymers (180 homopolymers and 201 copolymers), we show that graph construction and self-supervised pretraining are jointly necessary: without pretraining, the large graph method matches the repeat-unit baseline (28.40 K vs. 28.36 K RMSE); with pretraining, it achieves 24.76 K +/- 3.30 K, a 5.1% reduction in mean error over the pretrained repeat-unit baseline (26.08 K +/- 4.20 K, p < 0.001, 30 runs). An ablation removing chemical features degrades performance to 36.65 K, confirming both components are essential. Results are architecture-agnostic, holding for both GINE and GATv2 encoders.

Are large language models superhuman chemists?

Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. This is relevant for the chemical sciences, which face the problem of small and diverse datasets that are frequently in the form of text. LLMs have shown promise in addressing these issues and are increasingly being harnessed to predict chemical properties, optimize reactions, and even design and conduct experiments autonomously. However, we still have only a very limited systematic understanding of the chemical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, which would be required to improve models and mitigate potential harms. Here, we introduce "ChemBench," an automated framework designed to rigorously evaluate the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs against the expertise of human chemists. We curated more than 7,000 question-answer pairs for a wide array of subfields of the chemical sciences, evaluated leading open and closed-source LLMs, and found that the best models outperformed the best human chemists in our study on average. The models, however, struggle with some chemical reasoning tasks that are easy for human experts and provide overconfident, misleading predictions, such as about chemicals' safety profiles. These findings underscore the dual reality that, although LLMs demonstrate remarkable proficiency in chemical tasks, further research is critical to enhancing their safety and utility in chemical sciences. Our findings also indicate a need for adaptations to chemistry curricula and highlight the importance of continuing to develop evaluation frameworks to improve safe and useful LLMs.