OSC2Runner: OpenSCENARIO 2.x Compliant High-Fidelity AV Simulation in CARLA

Scenario-Based Testing predominantly relies on the legacy ASAM OpenSCENARIO 1.x XML standard because existing continuous simulation frameworks lack native execution support for the recently matured v2.x Domain-Specific Language (DSL). Adapting legacy interpreters to evaluate v2.x logic introduces spatiotemporal drift, asynchronous event latencies, and artificial kinematic snapping. Addressing this execution gap, OSC2Runner introduces the first orchestration framework capable of natively mapping the OpenSCENARIO v2.x DSL to CARLA. The framework achieves this by formalizing scenario translation as a compilation pipeline through a multi-pass transpiler architecture. Bypassing static trajectory playback, the architecture synthesizes type-safe Abstract Syntax Trees directly into dynamic deterministic behavior trees (py_trees) natively mapped to CARLA's atomic APIs. Empirical validation in highly concurrent adversarial case studies demonstrates tick-by-tick determinism, exact spatial trigger evaluation, and 100.0 ms cross-actor blackboard synchronization. Kinematic analysis proves the strict adherence to continuous environmental boundaries. This architecture transitions Scenario-Based Testing from approximate behavioral interpretation to mathematically rigorous execution, establishing the deterministic backend required for co-simulation, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and automated LLM-driven generation pipelines.

On the Assessment of Sensitivity of Autonomous Vehicle Perception

The viability of automated driving is heavily dependent on the performance of perception systems to provide real-time accurate and reliable information for robust decision-making and maneuvers. These systems must perform reliably not only under ideal conditions, but also when challenged by natural and adversarial driving factors. Both of these types of interference can lead to perception errors and delays in detection and classification. Hence, it is essential to assess the robustness of the perception systems of automated vehicles (AVs) and explore strategies for making perception more reliable. We approach this problem by evaluating perception performance using predictive sensitivity quantification based on an ensemble of models, capturing model disagreement and inference variability across multiple models, under adverse driving scenarios in both simulated environments and real-world conditions. A notional architecture for assessing perception performance is proposed. A perception assessment criterion is developed based on an AV's stopping distance at a stop sign on varying road surfaces, such as dry and wet asphalt, and vehicle speed. Five state-of-the-art computer vision models are used, including YOLO (v8-v9), DEtection TRansformer (DETR50, DETR101), Real-Time DEtection TRansformer (RT-DETR)in our experiments. Diminished lighting conditions, e.g., resulting from the presence of fog and low sun altitude, have the greatest impact on the performance of the perception models. Additionally, adversarial road conditions such as occlusions of roadway objects increase perception sensitivity and model performance drops when faced with a combination of adversarial road conditions and inclement weather conditions. Also, it is demonstrated that the greater the distance to a roadway object, the greater the impact on perception performance, hence diminished perception robustness.