Agentic Personas for Adaptive Scientific Explanations with Knowledge Graphs

AI explanation methods often assume a static user model, producing non-adaptive explanations regardless of expert goals, reasoning strategies, or decision contexts. Knowledge graph-based explanations, despite their capacity for grounded, path-based reasoning, inherit this limitation. In complex domains such as scientific discovery, this assumption fails to capture the diversity of cognitive strategies and epistemic stances among experts, preventing explanations that foster deeper understanding and informed decision-making. However, the scarcity of human experts limits the use of direct human feedback to produce adaptive explanations. We present a reinforcement learning approach for scientific explanation generation that incorporates agentic personas, structured representations of expert reasoning strategies, that guide the explanation agent towards specific epistemic preferences. In an evaluation of knowledge graph-based explanations for drug discovery, we tested two personas that capture distinct epistemic stances derived from expert feedback. Results show that persona-driven explanations match state-of-the-art predictive performance while persona preferences closely align with those of their corresponding experts. Adaptive explanations were consistently preferred over non-adaptive baselines (n = 22), and persona-based training reduces feedback requirements by two orders of magnitude. These findings demonstrate how agentic personas enable scalable adaptive explainability for AI systems in complex and high-stakes domains.

Predicting Gene-Disease Associations with Knowledge Graph Embeddings over Multiple Ontologies

Ontology-based approaches for predicting gene-disease associations include the more classical semantic similarity methods and more recently knowledge graph embeddings. While semantic similarity is typically restricted to hierarchical relations within the ontology, knowledge graph embeddings consider their full breadth. However, embeddings are produced over a single graph and complex tasks such as gene-disease association may require additional ontologies. We investigate the impact of employing richer semantic representations that are based on more than one ontology, able to represent both genes and diseases and consider multiple kinds of relations within the ontologies. Our experiments demonstrate the value of employing knowledge graph embeddings based on random-walks and highlight the need for a closer integration of different ontologies.