Improving multichannel speech enhancement through accurate room-acoustic simulations

Room-acoustic simulations are widely used to augment training data for deep-learning-based speech enhancement. While most pipelines rely on simplified geometrical acoustics, wave-based approaches offer greater physical accuracy. In this work, we examine how simulation fidelity affects multichannel speech enhancement performance. To this end, we train SpatialNet on datasets augmented with different room-acoustic simulation methods and evaluate the resulting models on measured data. We compare lower-fidelity datasets based on geometrical acoustics with a high-fidelity dataset using advanced acoustic modelling and a hybrid combination of wave-based and geometrical acoustics simulations. Training on the high-fidelity dataset results in an up to 38 % relative reduction in median word error rate compared to the lower-fidelity alternatives. These results show that augmentation with high-fidelity room-acoustic simulations directly translates into improved multichannel speech enhancement performance.

Room-acoustic simulations as an alternative to measurements for audio-algorithm evaluation

Audio-signal-processing and audio-machine-learning (ASP/AML) algorithms are ubiquitous in modern technology like smart devices, wearables, and entertainment systems. Development of such algorithms and models typically involves a formal evaluation to demonstrate their effectiveness and progress beyond the state-of-the-art. Ideally, a thorough evaluation should cover many diverse application scenarios and room-acoustic conditions. However, in practice, evaluation datasets are often limited in size and diversity because they rely on costly and time-consuming measurements. This paper explores how room-acoustic simulations can be used for evaluating ASP/AML algorithms. To this end, we evaluate three ASP/AML algorithms with room-acoustic measurements and data from different simulation engines, and assess the match between the evaluation results obtained from measurements and simulations. The presented investigation compares a numerical wave-based solver with two geometrical acoustics simulators. While numerical wave-based simulations yielded similar evaluation results as measurements for all three evaluated ASP/AML algorithms, geometrical acoustic simulations could not replicate the measured evaluation results as reliably.