Where exactly does contextualization in a PLM happen?

Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have shown to be consistently successful in a plethora of NLP tasks due to their ability to learn contextualized representations of words (Ethayarajh, 2019). BERT (Devlin et al., 2018), ELMo (Peters et al., 2018) and other PLMs encode word meaning via textual context, as opposed to static word embeddings, which encode all meanings of a word in a single vector representation. In this work, we present a study that aims to localize where exactly in a PLM word contextualization happens. In order to find the location of this word meaning transformation, we investigate representations of polysemous words in the basic BERT uncased 12 layer architecture (Devlin et al., 2018), a masked language model trained on an additional sentence adjacency objective, using qualitative and quantitative measures.

Investigating the Encoding of Words in BERT's Neurons using Feature Textualization

Pretrained language models (PLMs) form the basis of most state-of-the-art NLP technologies. Nevertheless, they are essentially black boxes: Humans do not have a clear understanding of what knowledge is encoded in different parts of the models, especially in individual neurons. The situation is different in computer vision, where feature visualization provides a decompositional interpretability technique for neurons of vision models. Activation maximization is used to synthesize inherently interpretable visual representations of the information encoded in individual neurons. Our work is inspired by this but presents a cautionary tale on the interpretability of single neurons, based on the first large-scale attempt to adapt activation maximization to NLP, and, more specifically, large PLMs. We propose feature textualization, a technique to produce dense representations of neurons in the PLM word embedding space. We apply feature textualization to the BERT model (Devlin et al., 2019) to investigate whether the knowledge encoded in individual neurons can be interpreted and symbolized. We find that the produced representations can provide insights about the knowledge encoded in individual neurons, but that individual neurons do not represent clearcut symbolic units of language such as words. Additionally, we use feature textualization to investigate how many neurons are needed to encode words in BERT.