Effort-Based Criticality Metrics for Evaluating 3D Perception Errors in Autonomous Driving

Criticality metrics such as time-to-collision (TTC) quantify collision urgency but conflate the consequences of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) perception errors. We propose two novel effort-based metrics: False Speed Reduction (FSR), the cumulative velocity loss from persistent phantom detections, and Maximum Deceleration Rate (MDR), the peak braking demand from missed objects under a constant-acceleration model. These longitudinal metrics are complemented by Lateral Evasion Acceleration (LEA), adapted from prior lateral evasion kinematics and coupled with reachability-based collision timing to quantify the minimum steering effort to avoid a predicted collision. A reachability-based ellipsoidal collision filter ensures only dynamically plausible threats are scored, with frame-level matching and track-level aggregation. Evaluation of different perception pipelines on nuScenes and Argoverse~2 shows that 65-93% of errors are non-critical, and Spearman correlation analysis confirms that all three metrics capture safety-relevant information inaccessible to established time-based, deceleration-based, or normalized criticality measures, enabling targeted mining of the most critical perception failures.

Contour Errors: An Ego-Centric Metric for Reliable 3D Multi-Object Tracking

Finding reliable matches is essential in multi-object tracking to ensure the accuracy and reliability of perception systems in safety-critical applications such as autonomous vehicles. Effective matching mitigates perception errors, enhancing object identification and tracking for improved performance and safety. However, traditional metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and Center Point Distances (CPDs), which are effective in 2D image planes, often fail to find critical matches in complex 3D scenes. To address this limitation, we introduce Contour Errors (CEs), an ego or object-centric metric for identifying matches of interest in tracking scenarios from a functional perspective. By comparing bounding boxes in the ego vehicle's frame, contour errors provide a more functionally relevant assessment of object matches. Extensive experiments on the nuScenes dataset demonstrate that contour errors improve the reliability of matches over the state-of-the-art 2D IoU and CPD metrics in tracking-by-detection methods. In 3D car tracking, our results show that Contour Errors reduce functional failures (FPs/FNs) by 80% at close ranges and 60% at far ranges compared to IoU in the evaluation stage.