Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Content-Centric Cognitive Agents Using LLMs

The paper describes a system that uses large language model (LLM) technology to support the automatic learning of new entries in an intelligent agent's semantic lexicon. The process is bootstrapped by an existing non-toy lexicon and a natural language generator that converts formal, ontologically-grounded representations of meaning into natural language sentences. The learning method involves a sequence of LLM requests and includes an automatic quality control step. To date, this learning method has been applied to learning multiword expressions whose meanings are equivalent to those of transitive verbs in the agent's lexicon. The experiment demonstrates the benefits of a hybrid learning architecture that integrates knowledge-based methods and resources with both traditional data analytics and LLMs.

Knowledge Engineering in the Long Game of Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Speech Acts

This paper describes principles and practices of knowledge engineering that enable the development of holistic language-endowed intelligent agents that can function across domains and applications, as well as expand their ontological and lexical knowledge through lifelong learning. For illustration, we focus on dialog act modeling, a task that has been widely pursued in linguistics, cognitive modeling, and statistical natural language processing. We describe an integrative approach grounded in the OntoAgent knowledge-centric cognitive architecture and highlight the limitations of past approaches that isolate dialog from other agent functionalities.

From Submit to Submitted via Submission: On Lexical Rules in Large-Scale Lexicon Acquisition

This paper deals with the discovery, representation, and use of lexical rules (LRs) during large-scale semi-automatic computational lexicon acquisition. The analysis is based on a set of LRs implemented and tested on the basis of Spanish and English business- and finance-related corpora. We show that, though the use of LRs is justified, they do not come cost-free. Semi-automatic output checking is required, even with blocking and preemtion procedures built in. Nevertheless, large-scope LRs are justified because they facilitate the unavoidable process of large-scale semi-automatic lexical acquisition. We also argue that the place of LRs in the computational process is a complex issue.