Reasoning Towards Fairness: Mitigating Bias in Language Models through Reasoning-Guided Fine-Tuning

Recent advances in large-scale generative language models have shown that reasoning capabilities can significantly improve model performance across a variety of tasks. However, the impact of reasoning on a model's ability to mitigate stereotypical responses remains largely underexplored. In this work, we investigate the crucial relationship between a model's reasoning ability and fairness, and ask whether improved reasoning capabilities can mitigate harmful stereotypical responses, especially those arising due to shallow or flawed reasoning. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of multiple open-source LLMs, and find that larger models with stronger reasoning abilities exhibit substantially lower stereotypical bias on existing fairness benchmarks. Building on this insight, we introduce ReGiFT -- Reasoning Guided Fine-Tuning, a novel approach that extracts structured reasoning traces from advanced reasoning models and infuses them into models that lack such capabilities. We use only general-purpose reasoning and do not require any fairness-specific supervision for bias mitigation. Notably, we see that models fine-tuned using ReGiFT not only improve fairness relative to their non-reasoning counterparts but also outperform advanced reasoning models on fairness benchmarks. We also analyze how variations in the correctness of the reasoning traces and their length influence model fairness and their overall performance. Our findings highlight that enhancing reasoning capabilities is an effective, fairness-agnostic strategy for mitigating stereotypical bias caused by reasoning flaws.

Biased or Flawed? Mitigating Stereotypes in Generative Language Models by Addressing Task-Specific Flaws

Recent studies have shown that generative language models often reflect and amplify societal biases in their outputs. However, these studies frequently conflate observed biases with other task-specific shortcomings, such as comprehension failure. For example, when a model misinterprets a text and produces a response that reinforces a stereotype, it becomes difficult to determine whether the issue arises from inherent bias or from a misunderstanding of the given content. In this paper, we conduct a multi-faceted evaluation that distinctly disentangles bias from flaws within the reading comprehension task. We propose a targeted stereotype mitigation framework that implicitly mitigates observed stereotypes in generative models through instruction-tuning on general-purpose datasets. We reduce stereotypical outputs by over 60% across multiple dimensions -- including nationality, age, gender, disability, and physical appearance -- by addressing comprehension-based failures, and without relying on explicit debiasing techniques. We evaluate several state-of-the-art generative models to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach while maintaining the overall utility. Our findings highlight the need to critically disentangle the concept of `bias' from other types of errors to build more targeted and effective mitigation strategies. CONTENT WARNING: Some examples contain offensive stereotypes.

AMaizeD: An End to End Pipeline for Automatic Maize Disease Detection

This research paper presents AMaizeD: An End to End Pipeline for Automatic Maize Disease Detection, an automated framework for early detection of diseases in maize crops using multispectral imagery obtained from drones. A custom hand-collected dataset focusing specifically on maize crops was meticulously gathered by expert researchers and agronomists. The dataset encompasses a diverse range of maize varieties, cultivation practices, and environmental conditions, capturing various stages of maize growth and disease progression. By leveraging multispectral imagery, the framework benefits from improved spectral resolution and increased sensitivity to subtle changes in plant health. The proposed framework employs a combination of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as feature extractors and segmentation techniques to identify both the maize plants and their associated diseases. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework in detecting a range of maize diseases, including powdery mildew, anthracnose, and leaf blight. The framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the custom hand-collected dataset and contributes to the field of automated disease detection in agriculture, offering a practical solution for early identification of diseases in maize crops advanced machine learning techniques and deep learning architectures.