Updating belief functions over Belnap--Dunn logic

Belief and plausibility are weaker measures of uncertainty than that of probability. They are motivated by the situations when full probabilistic information is not available. However, information can also be contradictory. Therefore, the framework of classical logic is not necessarily the most adequate. Belnap-Dunn logic was introduced to reason about incomplete and contradictory information. Klein et al and Bilkova et al generalize the notion of probability measures and belief functions to Belnap-Dunn logic, respectively. In this article, we study how to update belief functions with new pieces of information. We present a first approach via a frame semantics of Belnap-Dunn logic.

Distributed Transition Systems with Tags for Privacy Analysis

We present a logical framework that formally models how a given private information P stored on a given database D, can get captured progressively, by an agent/adversary querying the database repeatedly.Named DLTTS (Distributed Labeled Tagged Transition System), the frame-work borrows ideas from several domains: Probabilistic Automata of Segala, Probabilistic Concurrent Systems, and Probabilistic labelled transition systems. To every node on a DLTTS is attached a tag that represents the 'current' knowledge of the adversary, acquired from the responses of the answering mechanism of the DBMS to his/her queries, at the nodes traversed earlier, along any given run; this knowledge is completed at the same node, with further relational deductions, possibly in combination with 'public' information from other databases given in advance. A 'blackbox' mechanism is also part of a DLTTS, and it is meant as an oracle; its role is to tell if the private information has been deduced by the adversary at the current node, and if so terminate the run. An additional special feature is that the blackbox also gives information on how 'close',or how 'far', the knowledge of the adversary is, from the private information P , at the current node. A metric is defined for that purpose, on the set of all 'type compatible' tuples from the given database, the data themselves being typed with the headers of the base. Despite the transition systems flavor of our framework, this metric is not 'behavioral' in the sense presented in some other works. It is exclusively database oriented,and allows to define new notions of adjacency and of -indistinguishabilty between databases, more generally than those usually based on the Hamming metric (and a restricted notion of adjacency). Examples are given all along to illustrate how our framework works. Keywords:Database, Privacy, Transition System, Probability, Distribution.

Toward a Dempster-Shafer theory of concepts

In this paper, we generalize the basic notions and results of Dempster-Shafer theory from predicates to formal concepts. Results include the representation of conceptual belief functions as inner measures of suitable probability functions, and a Dempster-Shafer rule of combination on belief functions on formal concepts.