Catastrophic Forgetting in the Context of Model Updates

A large obstacle to deploying deep learning models in practice is the process of updating models post-deployment (ideally, frequently). Deep neural networks can cost many thousands of dollars to train. When new data comes in the pipeline, you can train a new model from scratch (randomly initialized weights) on all existing data. Instead, you can take an existing model and fine-tune (continue to train) it on new data. The former is costly and slow. The latter is cheap and fast, but catastrophic forgetting generally causes the new model to 'forget' how to classify older data well. There are a plethora of complicated techniques to keep models from forgetting their past learnings. Arguably the most basic is to mix in a small amount of past data into the new data during fine-tuning: also known as 'data rehearsal'. In this paper, we compare various methods of limiting catastrophic forgetting and conclude that if you can maintain access to a portion of your past data (or tasks), data rehearsal is ideal in terms of overall accuracy across all time periods, and performs even better when combined with methods like Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC). Especially when the amount of past data (past 'tasks') is large compared to new data, the cost of updating an existing model is far cheaper and faster than training a new model from scratch.

Magnificent Minified Models

This paper concerns itself with the task of taking a large trained neural network and 'compressing' it to be smaller by deleting parameters or entire neurons, with minimal decreases in the resulting model accuracy. We compare various methods of parameter and neuron selection: dropout-based neuron damage estimation, neuron merging, absolute-value based selection, random selection, OBD (Optimal Brain Damage). We also compare a variation on the classic OBD method that slightly outperformed all other parameter and neuron selection methods in our tests with substantial pruning, which we call OBD-SD. We compare these methods against quantization of parameters. We also compare these techniques (all applied to a trained neural network), with neural networks trained from scratch (random weight initialization) on various pruned architectures. Our results are only barely consistent with the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, in that fine-tuning a parameter-pruned model does slightly better than retraining a similarly pruned model from scratch with randomly initialized weights. For neuron-level pruning, retraining from scratch did much better in our experiments.