Adversarial Attacks in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines: Unveiling Structural Vulnerabilities in Agentic AI Architectures

Multi-agent LLM pipelines orchestrate multiple specialized language model agents into structured workflows where intermediate outputs are passed across agents to solve complex tasks. This design introduces a security gap absent in single-agent settings: once an agent accepts adversarial content, it is propagated as trusted input throughout the pipeline. We argue that this vulnerability stems from the absence of boundary verification, a security primitive that enforces explicit validation of data as it crosses inter-agent boundaries, including content, identity, execution intent, and state integrity. Without such verification, modern pipelines embed implicit trust assumptions that are not adversarially robust, giving rise to structurally distinct attack surfaces (e.g., content injection, agent impersonation, plan deviation, and memory poisoning). Leveraging annotated production traces from the GAIA and SWE-Bench benchmark, we show that these vulnerabilities arise in benign deployments and largely evade existing evaluation frameworks. We further operationalize these failure modes within a controlled multi-agent setting and evaluate them across GPT-5-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and Kimi K2.5 under identical pipeline configurations. The results reveal that attack success aligns with pipeline structure rather than model capability, indicating that adversarial vulnerability is fundamentally an architectural property and motivating a shift toward pipeline-level defenses.

From Sentiment to Actionable Insights: A Data-Driven Public Sentiment Analysis of Advanced Air Mobility

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) is an emerging low-altitude air transportation system whose successful deployment depends not only on technological advancement but also on public acceptance. This acceptance will drive government support, regulations, noise standards, and willingness to fly, and in turn the overall commercial viability of AAM. Understanding public sentiment toward AAM is therefore essential for identifying its societal barriers and informing its adoption strategies. This study analyzes 306,009 human-generated texts collected from Reddit and Quora to examine public discourse on AAM using AI-based models. Because multiple sentiment analysis models exist, identifying the most accurate model is critical for reliable AAM sentiment prediction and trustworthy public opinion analysis. Accordingly, seven models spanning lexicon-based, machine learning, deep learning, and transformer-based approaches are evaluated for AAM-specific sentiment classification. ModernBERT achieves the best classification performance and is used to label the full dataset. Using the resulting sentiment labels, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is applied within each sentiment class to uncover latent topics in public opinion. The analysis identifies 20 distinct topics and traces their temporal evolution from 2008 to 2025. A cross-sentiment topic analysis further reveals six major clusters of public concern: workforce and skill development (25.29% of the dataset), regulation and compliance (24.64%), technical performance of drones (20.99%), military, geopolitics, and defense (14.58%), safety and operational risks (8.51%), and noise and disturbance (5.98%). Based on these findings, this study provides actionable strategies to address these concerns, thereby, improving public acceptance and support AAM deployment.