Post Hoc Extraction of Pareto Fronts for Continuous Control

Agents in the real world must often balance multiple objectives, such as speed, stability, and energy efficiency in continuous control. To account for changing conditions and preferences, an agent must ideally learn a Pareto frontier of policies representing multiple optimal trade-offs. Recent advances in multi-policy multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) enable learning a Pareto front directly, but require full multi-objective consideration from the start of training. In practice, multi-objective preferences often arise after a policy has already been trained on a single specialised objective. Existing MORL methods cannot leverage these pre-trained `specialists' to learn Pareto fronts and avoid incurring the sample costs of retraining. We introduce Mixed Advantage Pareto Extraction (MAPEX), an offline MORL method that constructs a frontier of policies by reusing pre-trained specialist policies, critics, and replay buffers. MAPEX combines evaluations from specialist critics into a mixed advantage signal, and weights a behaviour cloning loss with it to train new policies that balance multiple objectives. MAPEX's post hoc Pareto front extraction preserves the simplicity of single-objective off-policy RL, and avoids retrofitting these algorithms into complex MORL frameworks. We formally describe the MAPEX procedure and evaluate MAPEX on five multi-objective MuJoCo environments. Given the same starting policies, MAPEX produces comparable fronts at $0.001\%$ the sample cost of established baselines.

A COLREGs-Compliant Conflict Resolution Strategy for Autonomous Surface Vehicles

This paper presents a novel conflict resolution strategy for autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) to safely navigate and avoid collisions in a multi-vessel environment at sea. Collisions between two or more marine vessels must be avoided by following the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). We propose strategy a two-phase strategy called as COLREGs Compliant Conflict-Resolving (COMCORE) strategy, that generates collision-free trajectories for ASVs while complying with COLREGs. In phase-1, a shortest path for each agent is determined, while in phase-2 conflicts are detected and resolved by modifying the path in compliance with COLREGs. COMCORE solution optimises vessel trajectories for lower costs while also providing a safe and collision-free plan for each vessel. Simulation results are presented to show the applicability of COMCORE for larger number agents with very low computational requirement and hence scalable. Further, we experimentally demonstrate COMCORE for two ASVs in a lake to show its ability to determine solution and implementation capability in the real-world.