Learning Control Policies for Variable Objectives from Offline Data

Offline reinforcement learning provides a viable approach to obtain advanced control strategies for dynamical systems, in particular when direct interaction with the environment is not available. In this paper, we introduce a conceptual extension for model-based policy search methods, called variable objective policy (VOP). With this approach, policies are trained to generalize efficiently over a variety of objectives, which parameterize the reward function. We demonstrate that by altering the objectives passed as input to the policy, users gain the freedom to adjust its behavior or re-balance optimization targets at runtime, without need for collecting additional observation batches or re-training.

Automatic Trade-off Adaptation in Offline RL

Recently, offline RL algorithms have been proposed that remain adaptive at runtime. For example, the LION algorithm \cite{lion} provides the user with an interface to set the trade-off between behavior cloning and optimality w.r.t. the estimated return at runtime. Experts can then use this interface to adapt the policy behavior according to their preferences and find a good trade-off between conservatism and performance optimization. Since expert time is precious, we extend the methodology with an autopilot that automatically finds the correct parameterization of the trade-off, yielding a new algorithm which we term AutoLION.

User-Interactive Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline reinforcement learning algorithms still lack trust in practice due to the risk that the learned policy performs worse than the original policy that generated the dataset or behaves in an unexpected way that is unfamiliar to the user. At the same time, offline RL algorithms are not able to tune their most important hyperparameter - the proximity of the learned policy to the original policy. We propose an algorithm that allows the user to tune this hyperparameter at runtime, thereby overcoming both of the above mentioned issues simultaneously. This allows users to start with the original behavior and grant successively greater deviation, as well as stopping at any time when the policy deteriorates or the behavior is too far from the familiar one.

Comparing Model-free and Model-based Algorithms for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) Algorithms are often designed with environments such as MuJoCo in mind, in which the planning horizon is extremely long and no noise exists. We compare model-free, model-based, as well as hybrid offline RL approaches on various industrial benchmark (IB) datasets to test the algorithms in settings closer to real world problems, including complex noise and partially observable states. We find that on the IB, hybrid approaches face severe difficulties and that simpler algorithms, such as rollout based algorithms or model-free algorithms with simpler regularizers perform best on the datasets.

Measuring Data Quality for Dataset Selection in Offline Reinforcement Learning

Recently developed offline reinforcement learning algorithms have made it possible to learn policies directly from pre-collected datasets, giving rise to a new dilemma for practitioners: Since the performance the algorithms are able to deliver depends greatly on the dataset that is presented to them, practitioners need to pick the right dataset among the available ones. This problem has so far not been discussed in the corresponding literature. We discuss ideas how to select promising datasets and propose three very simple indicators: Estimated relative return improvement (ERI) and estimated action stochasticity (EAS), as well as a combination of the two (COI), and empirically show that despite their simplicity they can be very effectively used for dataset selection.

Behavior Constraining in Weight Space for Offline Reinforcement Learning

In offline reinforcement learning, a policy needs to be learned from a single pre-collected dataset. Typically, policies are thus regularized during training to behave similarly to the data generating policy, by adding a penalty based on a divergence between action distributions of generating and trained policy. We propose a new algorithm, which constrains the policy directly in its weight space instead, and demonstrate its effectiveness in experiments.

Overcoming Model Bias for Robust Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning

State-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms mostly rely on being allowed to directly interact with their environment to collect millions of observations. This makes it hard to transfer their success to industrial control problems, where simulations are often very costly or do not exist, and exploring in the real environment can potentially lead to catastrophic events. Recently developed, model-free, offline algorithms, can learn from a single dataset by mitigating extrapolation error in value functions. However, the robustness of the training process is still comparatively low, a problem known from methods using value functions. To improve robustness and stability of the learning process, we use dynamics models to assess policy performance instead of value functions, resulting in MOOSE (MOdel-based Offline policy Search with Ensembles), an algorithm which ensures low model bias by keeping the policy within the support of the data. We compare MOOSE with state-of-the-art model-free, offline RL algorithms BEAR and BCQ on the Industrial Benchmark and Mujoco continuous control tasks in terms of robust performance, and find that MOOSE outperforms its model-free counterparts in almost all considered cases, often even by far.