CATPlan: Loss-based Collision Prediction in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the design, training, and evaluation of end-to-end autonomous driving (AD) systems. One often overlooked aspect is the uncertainty of planned trajectories predicted by these systems, despite awareness of their own uncertainty being key to achieve safety and robustness. We propose to estimate this uncertainty by adapting loss prediction from the uncertainty quantification literature. To this end, we introduce a novel light-weight module, dubbed CATPlan, that is trained to decode motion and planning embeddings into estimates of the collision loss used to partially supervise end-to-end AD systems. During inference, these estimates are interpreted as collision risk. We evaluate CATPlan on the safety-critical, nerf-based, closed-loop benchmark NeuroNCAP and find that it manages to detect collisions with a $54.8\%$ relative improvement to average precision over a GMM-based baseline in which the predicted trajectory is compared to the forecasted trajectories of other road users. Our findings indicate that the addition of CATPlan can lead to safer end-to-end AD systems and hope that our work will spark increased interest in uncertainty quantification for such systems.

Hinge-Wasserstein: Mitigating Overconfidence in Regression by Classification

Modern deep neural networks are prone to being overconfident despite their drastically improved performance. In ambiguous or even unpredictable real-world scenarios, this overconfidence can pose a major risk to the safety of applications. For regression tasks, the regression-by-classification approach has the potential to alleviate these ambiguities by instead predicting a discrete probability density over the desired output. However, a density estimator still tends to be overconfident when trained with the common NLL loss. To mitigate the overconfidence problem, we propose a loss function, hinge-Wasserstein, based on the Wasserstein Distance. This loss significantly improves the quality of both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, compared to previous work. We demonstrate the capabilities of the new loss on a synthetic dataset, where both types of uncertainty are controlled separately. Moreover, as a demonstration for real-world scenarios, we evaluate our approach on the benchmark dataset Horizon Lines in the Wild. On this benchmark, using the hinge-Wasserstein loss reduces the Area Under Sparsification Error (AUSE) for horizon parameters slope and offset, by 30.47% and 65.00%, respectively.