Embedding-Based Intrusive Evaluation Metrics for Musical Source Separation Using MERT Representations

Evaluation of musical source separation (MSS) has traditionally relied on Blind Source Separation Evaluation (BSS-Eval) metrics. However, recent work suggests that BSS-Eval metrics exhibit low correlation between metrics and perceptual audio quality ratings from a listening test, which is considered the gold standard evaluation method. As an alternative approach in singing voice separation, embedding-based intrusive metrics that leverage latent representations from large self-supervised audio models such as Music undERstanding with large-scale self-supervised Training (MERT) embeddings have been introduced. In this work, we analyze the correlation of perceptual audio quality ratings with two intrusive embedding-based metrics: a mean squared error (MSE) and an intrusive variant of the Fréchet Audio Distance (FAD) calculated on MERT embeddings. Experiments on two independent datasets show that these metrics correlate more strongly with perceptual audio quality ratings than traditional BSS-Eval metrics across all analyzed stem and model types.

Towards Reliable Objective Evaluation Metrics for Generative Singing Voice Separation Models

Traditional Blind Source Separation Evaluation (BSS-Eval) metrics were originally designed to evaluate linear audio source separation models based on methods such as time-frequency masking. However, recent generative models may introduce nonlinear relationships between the separated and reference signals, limiting the reliability of these metrics for objective evaluation. To address this issue, we conduct a Degradation Category Rating listening test and analyze correlations between the obtained degradation mean opinion scores (DMOS) and a set of objective audio quality metrics for the task of singing voice separation. We evaluate three state-of-the-art discriminative models and two new competitive generative models. For both discriminative and generative models, intrusive embedding-based metrics show higher correlations with DMOS than conventional intrusive metrics such as BSS-Eval. For discriminative models, the highest correlation is achieved by the MSE computed on Music2Latent embeddings. When it comes to the evaluation of generative models, the strongest correlations are evident for the multi-resolution STFT loss and the MSE calculated on MERT-L12 embeddings, with the latter also providing the most balanced correlation across both model types. Our results highlight the limitations of BSS-Eval metrics for evaluating generative singing voice separation models and emphasize the need for careful selection and validation of alternative evaluation metrics for the task of singing voice separation.