Ethosight: A Reasoning-Guided Iterative Learning System for Nuanced Perception based on Joint-Embedding & Contextual Label Affinity

Traditional computer vision models often require extensive manual effort for data acquisition, annotation and validation, particularly when detecting subtle behavioral nuances or events. The difficulty in distinguishing routine behaviors from potential risks in real-world applications, such as differentiating routine shopping from potential shoplifting, further complicates the process. Moreover, these models may demonstrate high false positive rates and imprecise event detection when exposed to real-world scenarios that differ significantly from the conditions of the training data. To overcome these hurdles, we present Ethosight, a novel zero-shot computer vision system. Ethosight initiates with a clean slate based on user requirements and semantic knowledge of interest. Using localized label affinity calculations and a reasoning-guided iterative learning loop, Ethosight infers scene details and iteratively refines the label set. Reasoning mechanisms can be derived from large language models like GPT4, symbolic reasoners like OpenNARS\cite{wang2013}\cite{wang2006}, or hybrid systems. Our evaluations demonstrate Ethosight's efficacy across 40 complex use cases, spanning domains such as health, safety, and security. Detailed results and case studies within the main body of this paper and an appendix underscore a promising trajectory towards enhancing the adaptability and resilience of computer vision models in detecting and extracting subtle and nuanced behaviors.

Neurosymbolic hybrid approach to driver collision warning

There are two main algorithmic approaches to autonomous driving systems: (1) An end-to-end system in which a single deep neural network learns to map sensory input directly into appropriate warning and driving responses. (2) A mediated hybrid recognition system in which a system is created by combining independent modules that detect each semantic feature. While some researchers believe that deep learning can solve any problem, others believe that a more engineered and symbolic approach is needed to cope with complex environments with less data. Deep learning alone has achieved state-of-the-art results in many areas, from complex gameplay to predicting protein structures. In particular, in image classification and recognition, deep learning models have achieved accuracies as high as humans. But sometimes it can be very difficult to debug if the deep learning model doesn't work. Deep learning models can be vulnerable and are very sensitive to changes in data distribution. Generalization can be problematic. It's usually hard to prove why it works or doesn't. Deep learning models can also be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Here, we combine deep learning-based object recognition and tracking with an adaptive neurosymbolic network agent, called the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (NARS), that can adapt to its environment by building concepts based on perceptual sequences. We achieved an improved intersection-over-union (IOU) object recognition performance of 0.65 in the adaptive retraining model compared to IOU 0.31 in the COCO data pre-trained model. We improved the object detection limits using RADAR sensors in a simulated environment, and demonstrated the weaving car detection capability by combining deep learning-based object detection and tracking with a neurosymbolic model.

Neurosymbolic Systems of Perception & Cognition: The Role of Attention

A cognitive architecture aimed at cumulative learning must provide the necessary information and control structures to allow agents to learn incrementally and autonomously from their experience. This involves managing an agent's goals as well as continuously relating sensory information to these in its perception-cognition information stack. The more varied the environment of a learning agent is, the more general and flexible must be these mechanisms to handle a wider variety of relevant patterns, tasks, and goal structures. While many researchers agree that information at different levels of abstraction likely differs in its makeup and structure and processing mechanisms, agreement on the particulars of such differences is not generally shared in the research community. A binary processing architecture (often referred to as System-1 and System-2) has been proposed as a model of cognitive processing for low- and high-level information, respectively. We posit that cognition is not binary in this way and that knowledge at any level of abstraction involves what we refer to as neurosymbolic information, meaning that data at both high and low levels must contain both symbolic and subsymbolic information. Further, we argue that the main differentiating factor between the processing of high and low levels of data abstraction can be largely attributed to the nature of the involved attention mechanisms. We describe the key arguments behind this view and review relevant evidence from the literature.