Picture for Olivier Roustant

Olivier Roustant

IMT, INSA Toulouse, RT-UQ, ANITI

Physics-informed, boundary-constrained Gaussian process regression for the reconstruction of fluid flow fields

Add code
Jul 23, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

Non-asymptotic confidence regions on RKHS. The Paley-Wiener and standard Sobolev space cases

Add code
Jul 09, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

General reproducing properties in RKHS with application to derivative and integral operators

Add code
Mar 20, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

High-dimensional additive Gaussian processes under monotonicity constraints

Add code
May 17, 2022
Figure 1 for High-dimensional additive Gaussian processes under monotonicity constraints
Figure 2 for High-dimensional additive Gaussian processes under monotonicity constraints
Figure 3 for High-dimensional additive Gaussian processes under monotonicity constraints
Figure 4 for High-dimensional additive Gaussian processes under monotonicity constraints
Viaarxiv icon

A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches

Add code
Oct 30, 2021
Figure 1 for A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches
Figure 2 for A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches
Figure 3 for A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches
Figure 4 for A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches
Viaarxiv icon

Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC

Add code
Jan 15, 2019
Figure 1 for Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC
Figure 2 for Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC
Figure 3 for Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC
Figure 4 for Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC
Viaarxiv icon

On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddings

Add code
Oct 22, 2018
Figure 1 for On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddings
Figure 2 for On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddings
Figure 3 for On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddings
Figure 4 for On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddings
Viaarxiv icon

Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraints

Add code
Oct 20, 2017
Figure 1 for Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraints
Figure 2 for Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraints
Figure 3 for Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraints
Figure 4 for Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraints
Viaarxiv icon

Poincaré inequalities on intervals -- application to sensitivity analysis

Add code
Dec 12, 2016
Figure 1 for Poincaré inequalities on intervals -- application to sensitivity analysis
Figure 2 for Poincaré inequalities on intervals -- application to sensitivity analysis
Figure 3 for Poincaré inequalities on intervals -- application to sensitivity analysis
Figure 4 for Poincaré inequalities on intervals -- application to sensitivity analysis
Viaarxiv icon

A warped kernel improving robustness in Bayesian optimization via random embeddings

Add code
Mar 18, 2015
Figure 1 for A warped kernel improving robustness in Bayesian optimization via random embeddings
Figure 2 for A warped kernel improving robustness in Bayesian optimization via random embeddings
Viaarxiv icon