Toward Faithful Segmentation Attribution via Benchmarking and Dual-Evidence Fusion

Attribution maps for semantic segmentation are almost always judged by visual plausibility. Yet looking convincing does not guarantee that the highlighted pixels actually drive the model's prediction, nor that attribution credit stays within the target region. These questions require a dedicated evaluation protocol. We introduce a reproducible benchmark that tests intervention-based faithfulness, off-target leakage, perturbation robustness, and runtime on Pascal VOC and SBD across three pretrained backbones. To further demonstrate the benchmark, we propose Dual-Evidence Attribution (DEA), a lightweight correction that fuses gradient evidence with region-level intervention signals through agreement-weighted fusion. DEA increases emphasis where both sources agree and retains causal support when gradient responses are unstable. Across all completed runs, DEA consistently improves deletion-based faithfulness over gradient-only baselines and preserves strong robustness, at the cost of additional compute from intervention passes. The benchmark exposes a faithfulness-stability tradeoff among attribution families that is entirely hidden under visual evaluation, providing a foundation for principled method selection in segmentation explainability. Code is available at https://github.com/anmspro/DEA.

To Agree or To Be Right? The Grounding-Sycophancy Tradeoff in Medical Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) adapted to the medical domain have shown strong performance on visual question answering benchmarks, yet their robustness against two critical failure modes, hallucination and sycophancy, remains poorly understood, particularly in combination. We evaluate six VLMs (three general-purpose, three medical-specialist) on three medical VQA datasets and uncover a grounding-sycophancy tradeoff: models with the lowest hallucination propensity are the most sycophantic, while the most pressure-resistant model hallucinates more than all medical-specialist models. To characterize this tradeoff, we propose three metrics: L-VASE, a logit-space reformulation of VASE that avoids its double-normalization; CCS, a confidence-calibrated sycophancy score that penalizes high-confidence capitulation; and Clinical Safety Index (CSI), a unified safety index that combines grounding, autonomy, and calibration via a geometric mean. Across 1,151 test cases, no model achieves a CSI above 0.35, indicating that none of the evaluated 7-8B parameter VLMs is simultaneously well-grounded and robust to social pressure. Our findings suggest that joint evaluation of both properties is necessary before these models can be considered for clinical use. Code is available at https://github.com/UTSA-VIRLab/AgreeOrRight

TRACE: Temporal Radiology with Anatomical Change Explanation for Grounded X-ray Report Generation

Temporal comparison of chest X-rays is fundamental to clinical radiology, enabling detection of disease progression, treatment response, and new findings. While vision-language models have advanced single-image report generation and visual grounding, no existing method combines these capabilities for temporal change detection. We introduce Temporal Radiology with Anatomical Change Explanation (TRACE), the first model that jointly performs temporal comparison, change classification, and spatial localization. Given a prior and current chest X-ray, TRACE generates natural language descriptions of interval changes (worsened, improved, stable) while grounding each finding with bounding box coordinates. TRACE demonstrates effective spatial localization with over 90% grounding accuracy, establishing a foundation for this challenging new task. Our ablation study uncovers an emergent capability: change detection arises only when temporal comparison and spatial grounding are jointly learned, as neither alone enables meaningful change detection. This finding suggests that grounding provides a spatial attention mechanism essential for temporal reasoning.

SRA-Seg: Synthetic to Real Alignment for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Synthetic data, an appealing alternative to extensive expert-annotated data for medical image segmentation, consistently fails to improve segmentation performance despite its visual realism. The reason being that synthetic and real medical images exist in different semantic feature spaces, creating a domain gap that current semi-supervised learning methods cannot bridge. We propose SRA-Seg, a framework explicitly designed to align synthetic and real feature distributions for medical image segmentation. SRA-Seg introduces a similarity-alignment (SA) loss using frozen DINOv2 embeddings to pull synthetic representations toward their nearest real counterparts in semantic space. We employ soft edge blending to create smooth anatomical transitions and continuous labels, eliminating the hard boundaries from traditional copy-paste augmentation. The framework generates pseudo-labels for synthetic images via an EMA teacher model and applies soft-segmentation losses that respect uncertainty in mixed regions. Our experiments demonstrate strong results: using only 10% labeled real data and 90% synthetic unlabeled data, SRA-Seg achieves 89.34% Dice on ACDC and 84.42% on FIVES, significantly outperforming existing semi-supervised methods and matching the performance of methods using real unlabeled data.