Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Tasks

Large Language Models (LLMs) are claimed to be capable of Natural Language Inference (NLI), necessary for applied tasks like question answering and summarization, yet this capability is under-explored. We present a series of behavioral studies on several LLM families (LLaMA, GPT-3.5, and PaLM) which probe their behavior using controlled experiments. We establish two factors which predict much of their performance, and propose that these are major sources of hallucination in generative LLM. First, the most influential factor is memorization of the training data. We show that models falsely label NLI test samples as entailing when the hypothesis is attested in the training text, regardless of the premise. We further show that named entity IDs are used as "indices" to access the memorized data. Second, we show that LLMs exploit a further corpus-based heuristic using the relative frequencies of words. We show that LLMs score significantly worse on NLI test samples which do not conform to these factors than those which do; we also discuss a tension between the two factors, and a performance trade-off.

Smoothing Entailment Graphs with Language Models

The diversity and Zipfian frequency distribution of natural language predicates in corpora leads to sparsity when learning Entailment Graphs. As symbolic models for natural language inference, an EG cannot recover if missing a novel premise or hypothesis at test-time. In this paper we approach the problem of vertex sparsity by introducing a new method of graph smoothing, using a Language Model to find the nearest approximations of missing predicates. We improve recall by 25.1 and 16.3 absolute percentage points on two difficult directional entailment datasets while exceeding average precision, and show a complementarity with other improvements to edge sparsity. We further analyze language model embeddings and discuss why they are naturally suitable for premise-smoothing, but not hypothesis-smoothing. Finally, we formalize a theory for smoothing a symbolic inference method by constructing transitive chains to smooth both the premise and hypothesis.

Modality and Negation in Event Extraction

Language provides speakers with a rich system of modality for expressing thoughts about events, without being committed to their actual occurrence. Modality is commonly used in the political news domain, where both actual and possible courses of events are discussed. NLP systems struggle with these semantic phenomena, often incorrectly extracting events which did not happen, which can lead to issues in downstream applications. We present an open-domain, lexicon-based event extraction system that captures various types of modality. This information is valuable for Question Answering, Knowledge Graph construction and Fact-checking tasks, and our evaluation shows that the system is sufficiently strong to be used in downstream applications.

Multivalent Entailment Graphs for Question Answering

Drawing inferences between open-domain natural language predicates is a necessity for true language understanding. There has been much progress in unsupervised learning of entailment graphs for this purpose. We make three contributions: (1) we reinterpret the Distributional Inclusion Hypothesis to model entailment between predicates of different valencies, like DEFEAT(Biden, Trump) entails WIN(Biden); (2) we actualize this theory by learning unsupervised Multivalent Entailment Graphs of open-domain predicates; and (3) we demonstrate the capabilities of these graphs on a novel question answering task. We show that directional entailment is more helpful for inference than bidirectional similarity on questions of fine-grained semantics. We also show that drawing on evidence across valencies answers more questions than by using only the same valency evidence.