Practical Hash Functions for Similarity Estimation and Dimensionality Reduction

Hashing is a basic tool for dimensionality reduction employed in several aspects of machine learning. However, the perfomance analysis is often carried out under the abstract assumption that a truly random unit cost hash function is used, without concern for which concrete hash function is employed. The concrete hash function may work fine on sufficiently random input. The question is if it can be trusted in the real world when faced with more structured input. In this paper we focus on two prominent applications of hashing, namely similarity estimation with the one permutation hashing (OPH) scheme of Li et al. [NIPS'12] and feature hashing (FH) of Weinberger et al. [ICML'09], both of which have found numerous applications, i.e. in approximate near-neighbour search with LSH and large-scale classification with SVM. We consider mixed tabulation hashing of Dahlgaard et al.[FOCS'15] which was proved to perform like a truly random hash function in many applications, including OPH. Here we first show improved concentration bounds for FH with truly random hashing and then argue that mixed tabulation performs similar for sparse input. Our main contribution, however, is an experimental comparison of different hashing schemes when used inside FH, OPH, and LSH. We find that mixed tabulation hashing is almost as fast as the multiply-mod-prime scheme ax+b mod p. Mutiply-mod-prime is guaranteed to work well on sufficiently random data, but we demonstrate that in the above applications, it can lead to bias and poor concentration on both real-world and synthetic data. We also compare with the popular MurmurHash3, which has no proven guarantees. Mixed tabulation and MurmurHash3 both perform similar to truly random hashing in our experiments. However, mixed tabulation is 40% faster than MurmurHash3, and it has the proven guarantee of good performance on all possible input.

Heavy hitters via cluster-preserving clustering

In turnstile $\ell_p$ $\varepsilon$-heavy hitters, one maintains a high-dimensional $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ subject to $\texttt{update}(i,\Delta)$ causing $x_i\leftarrow x_i + \Delta$, where $i\in[n]$, $\Delta\in\mathbb{R}$. Upon receiving a query, the goal is to report a small list $L\subset[n]$, $|L| = O(1/\varepsilon^p)$, containing every "heavy hitter" $i\in[n]$ with $|x_i| \ge \varepsilon \|x_{\overline{1/\varepsilon^p}}\|_p$, where $x_{\overline{k}}$ denotes the vector obtained by zeroing out the largest $k$ entries of $x$ in magnitude. For any $p\in(0,2]$ the CountSketch solves $\ell_p$ heavy hitters using $O(\varepsilon^{-p}\log n)$ words of space with $O(\log n)$ update time, $O(n\log n)$ query time to output $L$, and whose output after any query is correct with high probability (whp) $1 - 1/poly(n)$. Unfortunately the query time is very slow. To remedy this, the work [CM05] proposed for $p=1$ in the strict turnstile model, a whp correct algorithm achieving suboptimal space $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\log^2 n)$, worse update time $O(\log^2 n)$, but much better query time $O(\varepsilon^{-1}poly(\log n))$. We show this tradeoff between space and update time versus query time is unnecessary. We provide a new algorithm, ExpanderSketch, which in the most general turnstile model achieves optimal $O(\varepsilon^{-p}\log n)$ space, $O(\log n)$ update time, and fast $O(\varepsilon^{-p}poly(\log n))$ query time, and whp correctness. Our main innovation is an efficient reduction from the heavy hitters to a clustering problem in which each heavy hitter is encoded as some form of noisy spectral cluster in a much bigger graph, and the goal is to identify every cluster. Since every heavy hitter must be found, correctness requires that every cluster be found. We then develop a "cluster-preserving clustering" algorithm, partitioning the graph into clusters without destroying any original cluster.