Importance of Intent-Sharing for V2X-based Maneuver Coordination

This paper examines the critical role of intent-sharing in enabling effective maneuver coordination for connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). Successful maneuver coordinations require vehicles to accurately know other vehicles' driving intentions. Intent-sharing can be achieved by the remote vehicles directly communicating their plans with the ego vehicle, as opposed to the ego vehicle predicting the trajectory on the remote vehicles' behalf. In this paper, we investigate the potential of intent-sharing on maneuver coordination effectiveness by quantifying the percentage of successful coordinations. We analyze the potential of intent-sharing by comparing its effectiveness for coordinated lane changes in a highway scenario with the effectiveness of a trajectory prediction method based on current kinematic data. Our analysis demonstrates in two scenarios substantial improvements in maneuver coordination when CAVs have direct access to the nearby vehicles' driving intentions through intent sharing. These findings highlight the importance of including intent-sharing in the maneuver coordination protocol.

Multi-Target Maneuver Coordinations: Unlocking Coordination Opportunities in Connected Automated Driving

Maneuver coordination is a key enabler of connected and automated driving, allowing vehicles to negotiate and execute maneuvers that would otherwise be difficult, inefficient or unsafe. Existing approaches and use cases typically assume coordination with a single predefined target vehicle, which limits the number of coordination opportunities. This paper introduces a maneuver coordination approach based on multi-target selection, which allows a vehicle to identify and select among multiple potential coordination vehicles for a given maneuver. Multi-target maneuver coordination does not require modifications to the maneuver execution logic or to the underlying coordination protocol. Instead, it extends the decision-making process preceding coordination, enabling vehicles to exploit a broader set of feasible cooperative interactions. Results show that multi-target maneuver coordination significantly increases triggered and successfully executed coordinations while maintaining a low computational cost, as the proposed approach achieves these gains without requiring the analysis of a large number of potential target vehicles. These improvements preserve coordination success rates while enabling earlier maneuver initiation.

Mind the Noise: Sensitivity of Transformer-based Interaction-Aware Trajectory Prediction Models to Noisy Data

Trajectory prediction allows autonomous vehicles to anticipate the future behavior of surrounding objects (or agents) and, accordingly, maximize the safety and efficiency of their driving. State-of-the-art Transformed-based interaction-aware trajectory prediction models, which rely on attention mechanisms to capture multi-agent interactions and maximize prediction accuracy, are commonly trained and evaluated on long-range high-quality datasets. These datasets are typically obtained by aggregating data from multiple vehicles or drones and removing any object detection or tracking noise offline. Yet, information about a surrounding object's state (its position, speed, heading) is far from being noiseless in real-world deployments. Object state estimation is affected by perception uncertainties and localization errors that can be particularly large for objects received via Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communications. In this paper, we analyze the impact of noisy object state information on the trajectory prediction accuracy of a state-of-the-art Transformer-based interaction-aware trajectory prediction model. Our study demonstrates that trajectory prediction accuracy can rapidly deteriorate as the noise intensity increases. Numerical results show that the prediction accuracy can reduce by a 1.3x factor under small noise levels and by as much as a 3.9x factor under the highest (yet realistic) noise conditions. These findings reveal the strong sensitivity of trajectory prediction models to noisy data, underscoring the need for more realistic training and evaluation datasets as well as noise mitigation strategies.