Abstract:Variational quantum circuits with angle encoding implement truncated Fourier series, and architectures arranging $N$ qubits with $L$ encoding layers each -- sharing encoding budget $E = NL$ -- generate identical frequency spectra, identical frequency redundancy, and require the same minimum parameter count for coefficient control. Despite this equivalence, trainability varies substantially with architecture shape $(N,L)$ at fixed $E$. We identify structural rank deficiency of the coefficient matching Jacobian $J$ as the mechanism responsible. For serial single-qubit architectures, we prove $\mathrm{rank}(J) \leq 2L+1$ regardless of parameter count $P$, with $\dim(\ker J) \geq P-(2L+1)$ growing without bound -- a phenomenon we term \emph{structural gradient starvation}: a growing fraction of parameters become structurally decoupled from the loss as $P$ increases at fixed $L$. Parallel architectures avoid this via independent phase trajectories, ensuring $σ_{\min}(J^{(\mathrm{par})}) > 0$ generically for $P \leq 2E+1$, so no parameter lies in $\ker J$. For practitioners, we further show that the two natural routes to increasing parameter count have fundamentally different effects: adding feature map (FM) layers monotonically strengthens the Jacobian QFIM eigenvalue spectrum and achieves $R^2 \geq 0.95$ with $1.6$--$2.2\times$ fewer parameters than adding trainable blocks across all tested architectures, while trainable blocks improve training only through the classical interpolation mechanism with no quantum-specific benefit.
Abstract:Quantum computing (QC) promises theoretical advantages, benefiting computational problems that would not be efficiently classically simulatable. However, much of this theoretical speedup depends on the quantum circuit design solving the problem. We argue that QC literature has yet to explore more domain specific ansatz-topologies, instead of relying on generic, one-size-fits-all architectures. In this work, we show that incorporating task-specific inductive biases -- specifically geometric priors -- into quantum circuit design can enhance the performance of hybrid Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks (QuGANs) on the task of generating geometrically constrained K4 graphs. We evaluate a portfolio of entanglement topologies and loss-function designs to assess their impact on both statistical fidelity and compliance with geometric constraints, including the Triangle and Ptolemaic inequalities. Our results show that aligning circuit topology with the underlying problem structure yields substantial benefits: the Triangle-topology QuGAN achieves the highest geometric validity among quantum models and matches the performance of classical Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). Additionally, we showcase how specific architectural choices, such as entangling gate types, variance regularization and output-scaling govern the trade-off between geometric consistency and distributional accuracy, thus emphasizing the value of structured, task-aware quantum ansatz-topologies.
Abstract:Quantum policy evaluation (QPE) is a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm which is quadratically more efficient than an analogous classical Monte Carlo estimation. It makes use of a direct quantum mechanical realization of a finite Markov decision process, in which the agent and the environment are modeled by unitary operators and exchange states, actions, and rewards in superposition. Previously, the quantum environment has been implemented and parametrized manually for an illustrative benchmark using a quantum simulator. In this paper, we demonstrate how these environment parameters can be learned from a batch of classical observational data through quantum machine learning (QML) on quantum hardware. The learned quantum environment is then applied in QPE to also compute policy evaluations on quantum hardware. Our experiments reveal that, despite challenges such as noise and short coherence times, the integration of QML and QPE shows promising potential for achieving quantum advantage in RL.