Explainable Information Retrieval: A Survey

Explainable information retrieval is an emerging research area aiming to make transparent and trustworthy information retrieval systems. Given the increasing use of complex machine learning models in search systems, explainability is essential in building and auditing responsible information retrieval models. This survey fills a vital gap in the otherwise topically diverse literature of explainable information retrieval. It categorizes and discusses recent explainability methods developed for different application domains in information retrieval, providing a common framework and unifying perspectives. In addition, it reflects on the common concern of evaluating explanations and highlights open challenges and opportunities.

BERT Rankers are Brittle: a Study using Adversarial Document Perturbations

Contextual ranking models based on BERT are now well established for a wide range of passage and document ranking tasks. However, the robustness of BERT-based ranking models under adversarial inputs is under-explored. In this paper, we argue that BERT-rankers are not immune to adversarial attacks targeting retrieved documents given a query. Firstly, we propose algorithms for adversarial perturbation of both highly relevant and non-relevant documents using gradient-based optimization methods. The aim of our algorithms is to add/replace a small number of tokens to a highly relevant or non-relevant document to cause a large rank demotion or promotion. Our experiments show that a small number of tokens can already result in a large change in the rank of a document. Moreover, we find that BERT-rankers heavily rely on the document start/head for relevance prediction, making the initial part of the document more susceptible to adversarial attacks. More interestingly, we find a small set of recurring adversarial words that when added to documents result in successful rank demotion/promotion of any relevant/non-relevant document respectively. Finally, our adversarial tokens also show particular topic preferences within and across datasets, exposing potential biases from BERT pre-training or downstream datasets.

Towards Benchmarking the Utility of Explanations for Model Debugging

Post-hoc explanation methods are an important class of approaches that help understand the rationale underlying a trained model's decision. But how useful are they for an end-user towards accomplishing a given task? In this vision paper, we argue the need for a benchmark to facilitate evaluations of the utility of post-hoc explanation methods. As a first step to this end, we enumerate desirable properties that such a benchmark should possess for the task of debugging text classifiers. Additionally, we highlight that such a benchmark facilitates not only assessing the effectiveness of explanations but also their efficiency.

Neural OCR Post-Hoc Correction of Historical Corpora

Optical character recognition (OCR) is crucial for a deeper access to historical collections. OCR needs to account for orthographic variations, typefaces, or language evolution (i.e., new letters, word spellings), as the main source of character, word, or word segmentation transcription errors. For digital corpora of historical prints, the errors are further exacerbated due to low scan quality and lack of language standardization. For the task of OCR post-hoc correction, we propose a neural approach based on a combination of recurrent (RNN) and deep convolutional network (ConvNet) to correct OCR transcription errors. At character level we flexibly capture errors, and decode the corrected output based on a novel attention mechanism. Accounting for the input and output similarity, we propose a new loss function that rewards the model's correcting behavior. Evaluation on a historical book corpus in German language shows that our models are robust in capturing diverse OCR transcription errors and reduce the word error rate of 32.3% by more than 89%.