Benchmarking Deep Learning Approaches for AEC Engineering Drawing Layout Detection and Information Extraction

Information Extraction (IE) from Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) drawings remains hindered by manual inefficiency, while Layout Detection, a vital 'middleware' organizing graphical and textual hierarchies, is underexplored. General document layout models, optimized for text-centric content, lack validation on engineering drawings. This study constructs a custom AEC-specific layouts dataset and benchmarks five deep learning architectures. RF-DETR achieves state-of-the-art performance with an $mAP_{50}$ of 0.949, while the Vision-Language Model Qwen3-VL attains a leading F1-score of 0.911. Conversely, models pre-trained on general document datasets suffer from "domain interference", causing performance degradation. This establishes a robust technical foundation for automated IE in AEC.

Title block detection and information extraction for enhanced building drawings search

The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry still heavily relies on information stored in drawings for building construction, maintenance, compliance and error checks. However, information extraction (IE) from building drawings is often time-consuming and costly, especially when dealing with historical buildings. Drawing search can be simplified by leveraging the information stored in the title block portion of the drawing, which can be seen as drawing metadata. However, title block IE can be complex especially when dealing with historical drawings which do not follow existing standards for uniformity. This work performs a comparison of existing methods for this kind of IE task, and then proposes a novel title block detection and IE pipeline which outperforms existing methods, in particular when dealing with complex, noisy historical drawings. The pipeline is obtained by combining a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network and GPT-4o, the proposed inference pipeline detects building engineering title blocks with high accuracy, and then extract structured drawing metadata from the title blocks, which can be used for drawing search, filtering and grouping. The work demonstrates high accuracy and efficiency in IE for both vector (CAD) and hand-drawn (historical) drawings. A user interface (UI) that leverages the extracted metadata for drawing search is established and deployed on real projects, which demonstrates significant time savings. Additionally, an extensible domain-expert-annotated dataset for title block detection is developed, via an efficient AEC-friendly annotation workflow that lays the foundation for future work.

Outlier-Oriented Poisoning Attack: A Grey-box Approach to Disturb Decision Boundaries by Perturbing Outliers in Multiclass Learning

Poisoning attacks are a primary threat to machine learning models, aiming to compromise their performance and reliability by manipulating training datasets. This paper introduces a novel attack - Outlier-Oriented Poisoning (OOP) attack, which manipulates labels of most distanced samples from the decision boundaries. The paper also investigates the adverse impact of such attacks on different machine learning algorithms within a multiclass classification scenario, analyzing their variance and correlation between different poisoning levels and performance degradation. To ascertain the severity of the OOP attack for different degrees (5% - 25%) of poisoning, we analyzed variance, accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and false positive rate for chosen ML models.Benchmarking our OOP attack, we have analyzed key characteristics of multiclass machine learning algorithms and their sensitivity to poisoning attacks. Our experimentation used three publicly available datasets: IRIS, MNIST, and ISIC. Our analysis shows that KNN and GNB are the most affected algorithms with a decrease in accuracy of 22.81% and 56.07% while increasing false positive rate to 17.14% and 40.45% for IRIS dataset with 15% poisoning. Further, Decision Trees and Random Forest are the most resilient algorithms with the least accuracy disruption of 12.28% and 17.52% with 15% poisoning of the IRIS dataset. We have also analyzed the correlation between number of dataset classes and the performance degradation of models. Our analysis highlighted that number of classes are inversely proportional to the performance degradation, specifically the decrease in accuracy of the models, which is normalized with increasing number of classes. Further, our analysis identified that imbalanced dataset distribution can aggravate the impact of poisoning for machine learning models