Diagnosing Knowledge Gaps in LLM Tool Use: An Agentic Benchmark for Novel API Acquisition

Large language models for code generation often need to use APIs that are absent from their pretraining data. This requires more than recalling a function name: models must coordinate signatures, module paths, input-output contracts, semantics, and executable usage patterns. Existing novel-API benchmarks are typically static, rely on coarse pass/fail metrics, or use synthetic APIs that may not reflect real library evolution. We introduce NovelAPIBench, a fully automated dynamic benchmark that, for any base model and target library, discovers novel APIs, extracts decomposed knowledge bundles, generates executable coding tasks, and assigns failed samples to six diagnostic categories. Across about 1.9K tasks, four base models, and five domains, we compare knowledge injected through retrieval with knowledge internalized through parametric adaptation. We find that knowledge components are not interchangeable: usage examples are the strongest standalone signal, while the best two-component setting pairs signatures with either mechanisms or examples depending on the domain and backbone. Adding more context, especially source code, can hurt by increasing import-path errors. Parametric adaptation also does not replace retrieval once external knowledge is removed; rather, fine-tuning mainly teaches models how to use provided bundles, and this ability transfers to held-out libraries. These results suggest that retrieval and tuning play complementary roles: retrieval supplies volatile API content, while tuning improves procedural integration.

ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems increasingly consist of agents that observe and respond to one another's outputs. While value alignment is typically evaluated for isolated models, how value perturbations propagate through agent interactions remains poorly understood. We present ValueFlow, a perturbation-based evaluation framework for measuring and analyzing value drift in multi-agent systems. ValueFlow introduces a 56-value evaluation dataset derived from the Schwartz Value Survey and quantifies agents' value orientations during interaction using an LLM-as-a-judge protocol. Building on this measurement layer, ValueFlow decomposes value drift into agent-level response behavior and system-level structural effects, operationalized by two metrics: beta-susceptibility, which measures an agent's sensitivity to perturbed peer signals, and system susceptibility (SS), which captures how node-level perturbations affect final system outputs. Experiments across multiple model backbones, prompt personas, value dimensions, and network structures show that susceptibility varies widely across values and is strongly shaped by structural topology.