When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategies

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in high-stakes workflows, where failures propagate beyond isolated model errors into systemic breakdowns that can lead to legal exposure, reputational damage, and material financial losses. Building on this shift from model-centric risks to end-to-end system vulnerabilities, we analyze real-world AI incident reporting and mitigation actions to derive an empirically grounded taxonomy that links failure dynamics to actionable interventions. Using a unified corpus of 9,705 media-reported AI incident articles, we extract explicit mitigation actions from 6,893 texts via structured prompting and then systematically classify responses to extend MIT's AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Our taxonomy introduces four new mitigation categories, including 1) Corrective and Restrictive Actions, 2) Legal/Regulatory and Enforcement Actions, 3) Financial, Economic, and Market Controls, and 4) Avoidance and Denial, capturing response patterns that are becoming increasingly prevalent as AI deployment and regulation evolve. Quantitatively, we label the mitigation dataset with 32 distinct labels, producing 23,994 label assignments; 9,629 of these reflect previously unseen mitigation patterns, yielding a 67% increase of the original subcategory coverage and substantially enhancing the taxonomy's applicability to emerging systemic failure modes. By structuring incident responses, the paper strengthens "diagnosis-to-prescription" guidance and advances continuous, taxonomy-aligned post-deployment monitoring to prevent cascading incidents and downstream impact.

Inferring short-term volatility indicators from Bitcoin blockchain

In this paper, we study the possibility of inferring early warning indicators (EWIs) for periods of extreme bitcoin price volatility using features obtained from Bitcoin daily transaction graphs. We infer the low-dimensional representations of transaction graphs in the time period from 2012 to 2017 using Bitcoin blockchain, and demonstrate how these representations can be used to predict extreme price volatility events. Our EWI, which is obtained with a non-negative decomposition, contains more predictive information than those obtained with singular value decomposition or scalar value of the total Bitcoin transaction volume.