Abstract:The diffusion MRI Neurite Exchange Imaging model offers a promising framework for probing gray matter microstructure by estimating parameters such as compartment sizes, diffusivities, and inter-compartmental water exchange time. However, existing protocols require long scan times. This study proposes a reduced acquisition scheme for the Connectome 2.0 scanner that preserves model accuracy while substantially shortening scan duration. We developed a data-driven framework using explainable artificial intelligence with a guided recursive feature elimination strategy to identify an optimal 8-feature subset from a 15-feature protocol. The performance of this optimized protocol was validated in vivo and benchmarked against the full acquisition and alternative reduction strategies. Parameter accuracy, preservation of anatomical contrast, and test-retest reproducibility were assessed. The reduced protocol yielded parameter estimates and cortical maps comparable to the full protocol, with low estimation errors in synthetic data and minimal impact on test-retest variability. Compared to theory-driven and heuristic reduction schemes, the optimized protocol demonstrated superior robustness, reducing the deviation in water exchange time estimates by over two-fold. In conclusion, this hybrid optimization framework enables viable imaging of neurite exchange in 14 minutes without loss of parameter fidelity. This approach supports the broader application of exchange-sensitive diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in neuroscience and clinical research, and offers a generalizable method for designing efficient acquisition protocols in biophysical parameter mapping.
Abstract:Diffusion MRI (dMRI) biophysical models hold promise for characterizing gray matter tissue microstructure. Yet, the reliability of estimated parameters remains largely under-studied, especially in models that incorporate water exchange. In this study, we investigate the accuracy, precision, and presence of degeneracy of two recently proposed gray matter models, NEXI and SANDIX, using two acquisition protocols from the literature, on both simulated and in vivo data. We employ $\mu$GUIDE, a Bayesian inference framework based on deep learning, to quantify model uncertainty and detect parameter degeneracies, enabling a more interpretable assessment of fitted parameters. Our results show that while some microstructural parameters, such as extra-cellular diffusivity and neurite signal fraction, are robustly estimated, others, such as exchange time and soma radius, are often associated with high uncertainty and estimation bias, especially under realistic noise conditions and reduced acquisition protocols. Comparisons with non-linear least squares fitting underscore the added value of uncertainty-aware methods, which allow for the identification and filtering of unreliable estimates. These findings emphasize the need to report uncertainty and consider model degeneracies when interpreting model-based estimates. Our study advocates for the integration of probabilistic fitting approaches in neuroscience imaging pipelines to improve reproducibility and biological interpretability.