Toward AI-Friendly Cartography: Understanding How Color Design Influences Foundation Model Spatial Reasoning on Sequential Choropleth Maps

Foundation models (FMs) increasingly support multimodal and geospatial reasoning, yet it remains unclear whether cartographic principles designed for human perception are equally effective for machines. Focusing on sequential choropleth maps, we examine how hue palette, color ordering, and lightness contrast influence FM spatial reasoning. We construct a controlled benchmark of 5,760 maps and 28,800 questions spanning Attribute Identify, Spatial Recognition, Compare, Rank, and Pattern Delineate, and evaluate 21 open-source and proprietary multimodal FMs. Results show that hue choice has limited and inconsistent effects, whereas disrupting sequential color ordering substantially reduces performance, especially for comparison and ranking. Reduced lightness contrast also consistently impairs reasoning, while increasing contrast beyond sufficient separability provides only marginal gains. LoRA fine-tuning improves overall accuracy but preserves these relative sensitivities. Additional factorial experiments further indicate that errors arise from color-and-legend decoding, spatial reasoning, and the integration of thematic attributes with spatial structure. These findings show that conventional sequential ordering and sufficient contrast remain important for machine map understanding and provide empirical guidance for AI-friendly cartographic design.

Do Maps Still Matter for Machines: Revisiting the Role of Choropleth Maps in Foundation Model Spatial Understanding

Spatial understanding is crucial for foundation models (FMs), and maps have long helped humans organize and reason about geographic information. This study examines whether choropleth maps remain useful for machine spatial understanding when models can directly process structured geodata. We introduce ChoroplethMap-Bench, a controlled benchmark containing 2,400 synthetic choropleth maps, corresponding GeoJSON data, and 12,000 questions across five cognitive dimensions: Identify, Spatial Recognition, Compare, Rank, and Delineate. We evaluate 22 open-source and proprietary models under three input conditions: Data Only, Map Only, and Data + Map. The results show that maps substantially improve spatial reasoning, especially when combined with symbolic data and for tasks requiring higher-level understanding of spatial patterns. We further analyze the effects of map type, color hue, and spatial structure, as well as prompting strategies, language, geographic context, decoding settings, classification methods, and response stability. Overall, the Data + Map condition achieves the strongest performance, demonstrating that maps remain valuable external representations for foundation model spatial reasoning.

Evolving Thematic Map Design in Academic Cartography: A Thirty-Year Study Based on Multilingual Journals

Thematic maps play a central role in academic communication, yet their large-scale design evolution has rarely been examined empirically. This study presents a longitudinal and multilingual analysis of thematic map design practices in academic cartography from 1990 to 2020. We compile a corpus of 45,732 research articles from sixteen authoritative Chinese- and English-language journals and extract 23,928 maps using computer vision and large-model-based document parsing to build a structured dataset. Map design characteristics are quantified across three dimensions: map elements, color design, and layout structure. Results show that Chinese- and Englishlanguage academic maps share highly similar structural conventions, typically employing restrained color palettes with neutral dominant hues, low saturation, high brightness, and limited hue diversity, as well as centered layouts with high main-map occupation ratios. Differences exist in that English-language maps show slightly greater hue richness and compactness, whereas Chinese-language maps historically rely more on neutral hues and integrated layouts. Temporal analysis reveals parallel evolutionary trends in both groups, including increasing element richness, legend usage, and hue diversity, alongside stable layout structures. Overall, the findings suggest that academic map design evolution is characterized more by institutional convergence than cultural divergence.

Thinking on Maps: How Foundation Model Agents Explore, Remember, and Reason Map Environments

Map environments provide a fundamental medium for representing spatial structure. Understanding how foundation model (FM) agents understand and act in such environments is therefore critical for enabling reliable map-based reasoning and applications. However, most existing evaluations of spatial ability in FMs rely on static map inputs or text-based queries, overlooking the interactive and experience-driven nature of spatial understanding.In this paper, we propose an interactive evaluation framework to analyze how FM agents explore, remember, and reason in symbolic map environments. Agents incrementally explore partially observable grid-based maps consisting of roads, intersections, and points of interest (POIs), receiving only local observations at each step. Spatial understanding is then evaluated using six kinds of spatial tasks. By systematically varying exploration strategies, memory representations, and reasoning schemes across multiple foundation models, we reveal distinct functional roles of these components. Exploration primarily affects experience acquisition but has a limited impact on final reasoning accuracy. In contrast, memory representation plays a central role in consolidating spatial experience, with structured memories particularly sequential and graph-based representations, substantially improving performance on structure-intensive tasks such as path planning. Reasoning schemes further shape how stored spatial knowledge is used, with advanced prompts supporting more effective multi-step inference. We further observe that spatial reasoning performance saturates across model versions and scales beyond a certain capability threshold, indicating that improvements in map-based spatial understanding require mechanisms tailored to spatial representation and reasoning rather than scaling alone.