Unlocking the Power of Critical Factors for 3D Visual Geometry Estimation

Feed-forward visual geometry estimation has recently made rapid progress. However, an important gap remains: multi-frame models usually produce better cross-frame consistency, yet they often underperform strong per-frame methods on single-frame accuracy. This observation motivates our systematic investigation into the critical factors driving model performance through rigorous ablation studies, which reveals several key insights: 1) Scaling up data diversity and quality unlocks further performance gains even in state-of-the-art visual geometry estimation methods; 2) Commonly adopted confidence-aware loss and gradient-based loss mechanisms may unintentionally hinder performance; 3) Joint supervision through both per-sequence and per-frame alignment improves results, while local region alignment surprisingly degrades performance. Furthermore, we introduce two enhancements to integrate the advantages of optimization-based methods and high-resolution inputs: a consistency loss function that enforces alignment between depth maps, camera parameters, and point maps, and an efficient architectural design that leverages high-resolution information. We integrate these designs into CARVE, a resolution-enhanced model for feed-forward visual geometry estimation. Experiments on point cloud reconstruction, video depth estimation, and camera pose/intrinsic estimation show that CARVE achieves strong and robust performance across diverse benchmarks.

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Preference-based Constraint Inference

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is a standard paradigm for safety-critical decision making. However, real-world safety constraints can be complex, subjective, and even hard to explicitly specify. Existing works on constraint inference rely on restrictive assumptions or extensive expert demonstrations, which is not realistic in many real-world applications. How to cheaply and reliably learn these constraints is the major challenge we focus on in this study. While inferring constraints from human preferences offers a data-efficient alternative, we identify the popular Bradley-Terry (BT) models fail to capture the asymmetric, heavy-tailed nature of safety costs, resulting in risk underestimation. It is still rare in the literature to understand the impacts of BT models on the downstream policy learning. To address the above knowledge gaps, we propose a novel approach namely Preference-based Constrained Reinforcement Learning (PbCRL). We introduce a novel dead zone mechanism into preference modeling and theoretically prove that it encourages heavy-tailed cost distributions, thereby achieving better constraint alignment. Additionally, we incorporate a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) loss to encourage exploration by cost variances, which is found to benefit policy learning. Further, two-stage training strategy are deployed to lower online labeling burdens while adaptively enhancing constraint satisfaction. Empirical results demonstrate that PbCRL achieves superior alignment with true safety requirements and outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of safety and reward. Our work explores a promising and effective way for constraint inference in Safe RL, which has great potential in a range of safety-critical applications.

Tilted Quantile Gradient Updates for Quantile-Constrained Reinforcement Learning

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is a popular and versatile paradigm to learn reward-maximizing policies with safety guarantees. Previous works tend to express the safety constraints in an expectation form due to the ease of implementation, but this turns out to be ineffective in maintaining safety constraints with high probability. To this end, we move to the quantile-constrained RL that enables a higher level of safety without any expectation-form approximations. We directly estimate the quantile gradients through sampling and provide the theoretical proofs of convergence. Then a tilted update strategy for quantile gradients is implemented to compensate the asymmetric distributional density, with a direct benefit of return performance. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed model fully meets safety requirements (quantile constraints) while outperforming the state-of-the-art benchmarks with higher return.