Exploring parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of billion-parameter vision models with QLoRA and DoRA: insights into generalization for limited-data image classification under a 98:1 test-to-train regime

Automated behavior classification is essential for precision livestock farming but faces challenges of high computational costs and limited labeled data. This study systematically compared three approaches: training from scratch (ResNet-18, ViT-Small), frozen feature extraction, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of the DINOv3 foundation model (6.7 billion parameters). We evaluated QLoRA and DoRA across multiple configurations varying rank (8, 16, 64) and target modules (q_proj versus all-linear layers). With 2,160 verified training images, we assessed generalization of our model on 211,800 test samples, which is essentially a 98:1 test-to-train ratio. Results demonstrated that PEFT substantially outperformed alternatives, where the best QLoRA configuration (all-linear layers and rank=64) achieved 83.16% test accuracy with only 2.72% parameters (183.0M) in 5.8 hours, compared to 72.87% for ResNet-18 (16.8 hours), 61.91% for ViT-Small (18.7 hours), and 76.56% for frozen DINOv3 (17.5 hours). DoRA achieved comparable accuracy (83.14%) but with longer training time (11.0 hours). Notably, increasing adapter capacity consistently improved generalization while simultaneously not causing overfitting: reducing rank from 16 to 8 decreased test accuracy from 78.38% to 77.17%, while expanding from q_proj-only to all-linear layers with rank=64 improved accuracy from 78.38% to 83.16%. This suggests underfitting, instead of overfitting, is the primary challenge when adapting foundation models to agricultural imagery. Our findings provide guidelines for deploying billion-parameter vision models with PEFT in agricultural livestock applications.

From Manual Observation to Automated Monitoring: Space Allowance Effects on Play Behaviour in Group-Housed Dairy Calves

Play behaviour serves as a positive welfare indicator in dairy calves, yet the influence of space allowance under commercial conditions remains poorly characterized, particularly at intermediate-to-high allowances (6-20 m2 per calf). This study investigated the relationship between space allowance and play behaviour in 60 group-housed dairy calves across 14 commercial farms in the Netherlands (space range: 2.66-17.98 m2 per calf), and developed an automated computer vision pipeline for scalable monitoring. Video observations were analyzed using a detailed ethogram, with play expressed as percentage of observation period (%OP). Statistical analysis employed linear mixed models with farm as a random effect. A computer vision pipeline was trained on manual annotations from 108 hours on 6 farms and validated on held-out test data. The computer vision classifier achieved 97.6% accuracy with 99.4% recall for active play detection. Calves spent on average 1.0% of OP playing reflecting around 10 minutes per 17-hour period. The space-play relationship was non-linear, with highest play levels at 8-10 m2 per calf (1.6% OP) and lowest at 6-8 m2 and 12-14 m2 (<0.6% OP). Space remained significant after controlling for age, health, and group size. In summary, these findings suggest that 8-10 m2 per calf represents a practical target balancing welfare benefits with economic feasibility, and demonstrate that automated monitoring can scale small annotation projects to continuous welfare assessment systems.

Evaluating Small Language Models for Agentic On-Farm Decision Support Systems

Large Language Models (LLM) hold potential to support dairy scholars and farmers by supporting decision-making and broadening access to knowledge for stakeholders with limited technical expertise. However, the substantial computational demand restricts access to LLM almost exclusively through cloud-based service, which makes LLM-based decision support tools impractical for dairy farming. To address this gap, lightweight alternatives capable of running locally on farm hardware are required. In this work, we benchmarked 20 open-source Small Language Models (SLM) available on HuggingFace under farm-realistic computing constraints. Building on our prior work, we developed an agentic AI system that integrates five task-specific agents: literature search, web search, SQL database interaction, NoSQL database interaction, and graph generation following predictive models. Evaluation was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, five test questions were used for the initial screening to identify models capable of following basic dairy-related instructions and performing reliably in a compute-constrained environment. Models that passed this preliminary stage were then evaluated using 30 questions (five per task category mentioned above, plus one category addressing integrity and misconduct) in phase two. In results, Qwen-4B achieved superior performance across most of task categories, although showed unstable effectiveness in NoSQL database interactions through PySpark. To our knowledge, this is the first work explicitly evaluating the feasibility of SLM as engines for dairy farming decision-making, with central emphases on privacy and computational efficiency. While results highlight the promise of SLM-assisted tools for practical deployment in dairy farming, challenges remain, and fine-tuning is still needed to refine SLM performance in dairy-specific questions.