STORM: Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-Guided Beam Search

Modern retrieval increasingly relies on dense and learned-sparse neural models that are effective but require encoding the entire corpus into a specialized index, rebuilt whenever the model changes. Lexical retrievers like BM25 stay efficient and transparent on a standard inverted index that need not change as models evolve, but suffer from vocabulary mismatch. LLM query rewriting can help, yet prompted rewriters emit well-formed but retrieval-ineffective or harmful-terms, and training against a retrieval reward gives only delayed, sequence-level supervision that obscures which terms helped. We introduce STORM (Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-guided beaM search), a self-supervised framework for lexical query expansion. STORM trains the rewriter through generation guided by retrieval metrics: at each step, candidate expansions are scored against the BM25 index and low-reward continuations pruned, turning the retrieval reward into a token-level signal that concentrates exploration on retrieval-effective vocabulary. Across TREC DL and BEIR, STORM lets 0.6B-8B backbones match or surpass competitive LLM rewriters while retrieving as fast as plain BM25; at 8B it rivals far larger proprietary rewriters. It further transfers zero-shot to 18 languages (MIRACL), beating dedicated multilingual dense retrievers on average, making STORM a competitive, infrastructure-light alternative to dense neural retrieval.

Statistical Foundations of DIME: Risk Estimation for Practical Index Selection

High-dimensional dense embeddings have become central to modern Information Retrieval, but many dimensions are noisy or redundant. Recently proposed DIME (Dimension IMportance Estimation), provides query-dependent scores to identify informative components of embeddings. DIME relies on a costly grid search to select a priori a dimensionality for all the query corpus's embeddings. Our work provides a statistically grounded criterion that directly identifies the optimal set of dimensions for each query at inference time. Experiments confirm achieving parity of effectiveness and reduces embedding size by an average of $\sim50\%$ across different models and datasets at inference time.

ECLIPSE: Contrastive Dimension Importance Estimation with Pseudo-Irrelevance Feedback for Dense Retrieval

Recent advances in Information Retrieval have leveraged high-dimensional embedding spaces to improve the retrieval of relevant documents. Moreover, the Manifold Clustering Hypothesis suggests that despite these high-dimensional representations, documents relevant to a query reside on a lower-dimensional, query-dependent manifold. While this hypothesis has inspired new retrieval methods, existing approaches still face challenges in effectively separating non-relevant information from relevant signals. We propose a novel methodology that addresses these limitations by leveraging information from both relevant and non-relevant documents. Our method, ECLIPSE, computes a centroid based on irrelevant documents as a reference to estimate noisy dimensions present in relevant ones, enhancing retrieval performance. Extensive experiments on three in-domain and one out-of-domain benchmarks demonstrate an average improvement of up to 19.50% (resp. 22.35%) in mAP(AP) and 11.42% (resp. 13.10%) in nDCG@10 w.r.t. the DIME-based baseline (resp. the baseline using all dimensions). Our results pave the way for more robust, pseudo-irrelevance-based retrieval systems in future IR research.