How the fly holds a single goal: normalization, not selection, in Drosophila FC2

A walking fly steers toward a goal direction, held as a bump of activity across the FC2 neurons of the fan-shaped body. These neurons also inhibit one another over distance, more strongly the farther apart they are, a feedback proposed to keep the fly on a single goal. We asked, from the connectome, what circuit produces this inhibition, and whether it lets FC2 actively choose one goal among competitors (a winner-take-all) or simply keeps a goal set elsewhere as one clean bump. Tracing the wiring in a single FlyWire brain, we find the inhibition is almost entirely global: four FB5A cells inhibit every FC2 neuron roughly equally, with a smaller, distance-dependent contribution from hDelta interneurons and a negligible direct component. A ring-attractor winner-take-all (the kind the compass uses) requires local recurrent excitation that the FC2 wiring lacks, so this geometry cannot build one; and across a range of dynamical models, including a spiking network, no version of the circuit locks onto a winner at the connectome-scaled reference coupling. FC2 therefore normalizes an externally set goal rather than selecting it, with FB5A likely acting as the global normalizer, much as the APL neuron does in the mushroom body. We are explicit about two open points: a different mechanism, mutual inhibition between two competing goals (which hDelta supplies), could in principle select at very strong coupling, and we bound rather than exclude it; and FB5A's inhibitory identity is a low-confidence prediction of the connectome's transmitter classifier, not yet measured, and likely not GABAergic. We then ask where the goal is actually set: the connectome nominates an upstream hDelta network and rules out the leading proposed alternative, whose neurons supply under 0.2% of FC2's input. Finally, we propose a direct experiment, silencing FB5A while imaging FC2, that would test the account.

Federated Few-Shot Learning on Neuromorphic Hardware: An Empirical Study Across Physical Edge Nodes

Federated learning on neuromorphic hardware remains unexplored because on-chip spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) produces binary weight updates rather than the floating-point gradients assumed by standard algorithms. We build a two-node federated system with BrainChip Akida AKD1000 processors and run approximately 1,580 experimental trials across seven analysis phases. Of four weight-exchange strategies tested, neuron-level concatenation (FedUnion) consistently preserves accuracy while element-wise weight averaging (FedAvg) destroys it (p = 0.002). Domain-adaptive fine-tuning of the upstream feature extractor accounts for most of the accuracy gains, confirming feature quality as the dominant factor. Scaling feature dimensionality from 64 to 256 yields 77.0% best-strategy federated accuracy (n=30, p < 0.001). Two independent asymmetries (wider features help federation more than individual learning, while binarization hurts federation more) point to a shared prototype complementarity mechanism: cross-node transfer scales with the distinctiveness of neuron prototypes.