KILVO: Kinematic-Inertial-LiDAR-Visual Odometry with Robust Multimodal Adaptation for Humanoid Robots

This article presents a kinematic-inertial-LiDAR-visual odometry for humanoid robots, called KILVO. Tailored to the platform features, requirements, and real-world complexity, it fully utilizes the sensors commonly equipped on humanoid robots, including joint encoders, IMU, LiDAR, and camera, within an asynchronous-sequential hybrid error-state iterated Kalman filter (ESIKF). Specifically, inertial data are used for prediction, leg kinematics are processed asynchronously at a high rate and provide proprioceptive constraints, while exteroception is updated sequentially, first by registering LiDAR points for geometric priors and then by updating the visual component via photometric errors. Moreover, the framework is elaborately designed with multimodal adaptation for resilience to sensor failures. A compact contact estimation module is also developed, sharing information with state estimation without additional sensors. Extensive experiments on public datasets and in the real world across multiple humanoid robots, gait patterns, and scenarios demonstrate that KILVO achieves highly competitive accuracy, efficiency, and output rates, with strong robustness against sensor degradation and failures, making it more suitable for humanoid robots than state-of-the-art fusion methods. Our code and datasets are released on GitHub.

A Pragmatic Note on Evaluating Generative Models with Fréchet Inception Distance for Retinal Image Synthesis

Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID), computed with an ImageNet pretrained Inception-v3 network, is widely used as a state-of-the-art evaluation metric for generative models. It assumes that feature vectors from Inception-v3 follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution and calculates the 2-Wasserstein distance based on their means and covariances. While FID effectively measures how closely synthetic data match real data in many image synthesis tasks, the primary goal in biomedical generative models is often to enrich training datasets ideally with corresponding annotations. For this purpose, the gold standard for evaluating generative models is to incorporate synthetic data into downstream task training, such as classification and segmentation, to pragmatically assess its performance. In this paper, we examine cases from retinal imaging modalities, including color fundus photography and optical coherence tomography, where FID and its related metrics misalign with task-specific evaluation goals in classification and segmentation. We highlight the limitations of using various metrics, represented by FID and its variants, as evaluation criteria for these applications and address their potential caveats in broader biomedical imaging modalities and downstream tasks.