FinRank: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Financial Question Answering and Retrieval over SEC Filings

Financial question answering is typically evaluated by answer correctness, yet in SEC filings a plausible and even numerically correct answer can be grounded in the wrong evidence. Similar facts and disclosures recur across sections of a filing, across reporting periods of the same firm, and across comparable firms. FinRank targets this provenance-sensitive retrieval problem by requiring systems to identify evidence for the intended entity, reporting period, and disclosure context. The benchmark contains 1185 manually authored question-answer records over the 10-K and 10-Q filings of 22 companies. Each record includes a reference answer, gold supporting passages, and hand-curated hard negatives drawn from confusable passages within filings, across reporting periods, and across comparable firms. FinRank evaluates passage retrieval, reranking, and hard-negative discrimination as separately measured tasks. Baseline results demonstrate the difficulty of this setting: among the evaluated systems, even a 7B instruction-tuned embedder reaches only 44.8% Recall@10 on the pooled evidence corpus; sub-billion-parameter encoders gain at most 3.5 points over BM25, a finance-adapted embedder trails BM25 by 9.7 points, and pairwise accuracy falls by 13.0-20.5 percentage points when random negatives are replaced with the curated hard negatives. FinRank provides an evidence-first benchmark for developing financial question answering systems that are not only accurate but also grounded in the correct disclosure.

Bypassing Document Ingestion: An MCP Approach to Financial Q&A

Answering financial questions is often treated as an information retrieval problem. In practice, however, much of the relevant information is already available in curated vendor systems, especially for quantitative analysis. We study whether, and under which conditions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) offers a more reliable alternative to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by allowing large language models (LLMs) to interact directly with data rather than relying on document ingestion and chunk retrieval. We test this by building a custom MCP server that exposes LSEG APIs as tools and evaluating it on the FinDER benchmark. The approach performs particularly well on the Financials subset, achieving up to 80.4% accuracy on multi-step numerical questions when relevant context is retrieved. The paper thus provides both a baseline for MCP-based financial question answering (QA) and evidence on where this approach breaks down, such as for questions requiring qualitative or document-specific context. Overall, direct access to curated data is a lightweight and effective alternative to document-centric RAG for quantitative financial QA, but not a substitute for all financial QA tasks.