COVIDGR dataset and COVID-SDNet methodology for predicting COVID-19 based on Chest X-Ray images

Currently, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), one of the most infectious diseases in the 21st century, is diagnosed using RT-PCR testing, CT scans and/or Chest X-Ray (CXR) images. CT (Computed Tomography) scanners and RT-PCR testing are not available in most medical centers and hence in many cases CXR images become the most time/cost effective tool for assisting clinicians in making decisions. Deep learning neural networks have a great potential for building triage systems for detecting COVID-19 patients, especially patients with low severity. Unfortunately, current databases do not allow building such systems as they are highly heterogeneous and biased towards severe cases. This paper is three-fold: (i) we demystify the high sensitivities achieved by most recent COVID-19 classification models, (ii) under a close collaboration with Hospital Universitario Cl\'inico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain, we built COVIDGR-1.0, a homogeneous and balanced database that includes all levels of severity, from Normal with positive RT-PCR, Mild, Moderate to Severe. COVIDGR-1.0 contains 377 positive and 377 negative PA (PosteroAnterior) CXR views and (iii) we propose COVID Smart Data based Network (COVID-SDNet) methodology for improving the generalization capacity of COVID-classification models. Our approach reaches good and stable results with an accuracy of $97.37\% \pm 1.86 \%$, $88.14\% \pm 2.02\%$, $66.5\% \pm 8.04\%$ in severe, moderate and mild COVID severity levels. Our approach could help in the early detection of COVID-19. COVIDGR-1.0 dataset will be made available after the review process.

Recent Trends in the Use of Statistical Tests for Comparing Swarm and Evolutionary Computing Algorithms: Practical Guidelines and a Critical Review

A key aspect of the design of evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms is studying their performance. Statistical comparisons are also a crucial part which allows for reliable conclusions to be drawn. In the present paper we gather and examine the approaches taken from different perspectives to summarise the assumptions made by these statistical tests, the conclusions reached and the steps followed to perform them correctly. In this paper, we conduct a survey on the current trends of the proposals of statistical analyses for the comparison of algorithms of computational intelligence and include a description of the statistical background of these tests. We illustrate the use of the most common tests in the context of the Competition on single-objective real parameter optimisation of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2017 and describe the main advantages and drawbacks of the use of each kind of test and put forward some recommendations concerning their use.

A tutorial on ensembles and deep learning fusion with MNIST as guiding thread: A complex heterogeneous fusion scheme reaching 10 digits error

Ensemble methods have been widely used for improving the results of the best single classification model. Indeed, a large body of works have achieved better results mainly by applying one specific ensemble method. However, very few works analyze complex fusion schemes using heterogeneous ensemble strategies. This paper is three-fold: 1) It provides a tutorial of the most popular ensemble methods, 2) analyzes the best ensembles using MNIST as guiding thread and 3) shows that complex fusion architectures based on heterogeneous ensembles can be considered as a mode of taking benefit from diversity. We introduce a complex fusion design that achieves a new record in MNIST with only 10 misclassified images.