Implications of the AI Act for Non-Discrimination Law and Algorithmic Fairness

The topic of fairness in AI, as debated in the FATE (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI) communities, has sparked meaningful discussions in the past years. However, from a legal perspective, particularly from European Union law, many open questions remain. Whereas algorithmic fairness aims to mitigate structural inequalities at the design level, European non-discrimination law is tailored to individual cases of discrimination after an AI model has been deployed. The AI Act might present a tremendous step towards bridging these two concepts by shifting non-discrimination responsibilities into the design stage of AI models. Based on an integrative reading of the AI Act, we comment on legal as well as technical enforcement problems and propose practical implications on bias detection and bias correction in order to specify and comply with specific technical requirements.

CollaFuse: Navigating Limited Resources and Privacy in Collaborative Generative AI

In the landscape of generative artificial intelligence, diffusion-based models present challenges for socio-technical systems in data requirements and privacy. Traditional approaches like federated learning distribute the learning process but strain individual clients, especially with constrained resources (e.g., edge devices). In response to these challenges, we introduce CollaFuse, a novel framework inspired by split learning. Tailored for efficient and collaborative use of denoising diffusion probabilistic models, CollaFuse enables shared server training and inference, alleviating client computational burdens. This is achieved by retaining data and computationally inexpensive GPU processes locally at each client while outsourcing the computationally expensive processes to the shared server. Demonstrated in a healthcare context, CollaFuse enhances privacy by highly reducing the need for sensitive information sharing. These capabilities hold the potential to impact various application areas, such as the design of edge computing solutions, healthcare research, or autonomous driving. In essence, our work advances distributed machine learning, shaping the future of collaborative GenAI networks.

A review of systematic selection of clustering algorithms and their evaluation

Data analysis plays an indispensable role for value creation in industry. Cluster analysis in this context is able to explore given datasets with little or no prior knowledge and to identify unknown patterns. As (big) data complexity increases in the dimensions volume, variety, and velocity, this becomes even more important. Many tools for cluster analysis have been developed from early on and the variety of different clustering algorithms is huge. As the selection of the right clustering procedure is crucial to the results of the data analysis, users are in need for support on their journey of extracting knowledge from raw data. Thus, the objective of this paper lies in the identification of a systematic selection logic for clustering algorithms and corresponding validation concepts. The goal is to enable potential users to choose an algorithm that fits best to their needs and the properties of their underlying data clustering problem. Moreover, users are supported in selecting the right validation concepts to make sense of the clustering results. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this paper provides assessment criteria for clustering method evaluation and validation concept selection. The criteria are applied to several common algorithms and the selection process of an algorithm is supported by the introduction of pseudocode-based routines that consider the underlying data structure.