Resilient Supplier Selection in Logistic 4.0: An integrated approach of Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making and Multi-choice Goal Programming with Heterogeneous

Supplier selection problem has gained extensive attention in the prior studies. However, research based on Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (F-MADM) approach in ranking resilient suppliers in logistic 4.0 is still in its infancy. Traditional MADM approach fails to address the resilient supplier selection problem in logistic 4.0 primarily because of the large amount of data concerning some attributes that are quantitative, yet difficult to process while making decisions. Besides, some qualitative attributes prevalent in logistic 4.0 entail imprecise perceptual or judgmental decision relevant information, and are substantially different than those considered in traditional suppler selection problems. This study, for the first time, develops a Decision Support System (DSS) that will help the decision maker to incorporate and process such imprecise heterogeneous data in a unified framework to rank a set of resilient suppliers in the logistic 4.0 environment. The proposed framework induces a triangular fuzzy number from large-scale temporal data using probability-possibility consistency principle. Large number of non-temporal data presented graphically are computed by extracting granular information that are imprecise in nature. Fuzzy linguistic variables are used to map the qualitative attributes. Finally, fuzzy based TOPSIS method is adopted to generate the ranking score of alternative suppliers. These ranking scores are used as input in a Multi-Choice Goal Programming (MCGP) model to determine optimal order allocation for respective suppliers. Finally, a sensitivity analysis assesses how the Cost versus Resilience Index (SCRI) changes when differential priorities are set for respective cost and resilience attributes.

A Possibility Distribution Based Multi-Criteria Decision Algorithm for Resilient Supplier Selection Problems

Resilient supplier selection problem is a key decision problem for an organization to gain competitive advantage. In the presence of multiple conflicting evaluation criteria, contradicting decision makers, and imprecise information sources, this problem becomes even more difficult to solve with the classical optimization approaches. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a viable alternative approach for handling the imprecise information associated with the evaluation proffered by the decision makers. In this work, we present a comprehensive algorithm for ranking a set of suppliers based on aggregated information obtained from crisp numerical assessments and reliability adjusted linguistic appraisals from a group of decision makers. We adapted two popular tools - Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets (SVNS) and Interval-valued fuzzy sets (IVFS) and extended them to incorporate both crisp and linguistic evaluations from the decision makers to obtain aggregated SVNS and IVFS. This information is then used to rank the suppliers by using TOPSIS method. We present a case study to illustrate the mechanism of the proposed algorithm and show sensitivity of the supplier ranking with respect to the priorities of evaluation criteria.