Secure and Effective Data Appraisal for Machine Learning

Essential for an unfettered data market is the ability to discreetly select and evaluate training data before finalizing a transaction between the data owner and model owner. To safeguard the privacy of both data and model, this process involves scrutinizing the target model through Multi-Party Computation (MPC). While prior research has posited that the MPC-based evaluation of Transformer models is excessively resource-intensive, this paper introduces an innovative approach that renders data selection practical. The contributions of this study encompass three pivotal elements: (1) a groundbreaking pipeline for confidential data selection using MPC, (2) replicating intricate high-dimensional operations with simplified low-dimensional MLPs trained on a limited subset of pertinent data, and (3) implementing MPC in a concurrent, multi-phase manner. The proposed method is assessed across an array of Transformer models and NLP/CV benchmarks. In comparison to the direct MPC-based evaluation of the target model, our approach substantially reduces the time required, from thousands of hours to mere tens of hours, with only a nominal 0.20% dip in accuracy when training with the selected data.

Machine-learning classifiers for logographic name matching in public health applications: approaches for incorporating phonetic, visual, and keystroke similarity in large-scale probabilistic record linkage

Approximate string-matching methods to account for complex variation in highly discriminatory text fields, such as personal names, can enhance probabilistic record linkage. However, discriminating between matching and non-matching strings is challenging for logographic scripts, where similarities in pronunciation, appearance, or keystroke sequence are not directly encoded in the string data. We leverage a large Chinese administrative dataset with known match status to develop logistic regression and Xgboost classifiers integrating measures of visual, phonetic, and keystroke similarity to enhance identification of potentially-matching name pairs. We evaluate three methods of leveraging name similarity scores in large-scale probabilistic record linkage, which can adapt to varying match prevalence and information in supporting fields: (1) setting a threshold score based on predicted quality of name-matching across all record pairs; (2) setting a threshold score based on predicted discriminatory power of the linkage model; and (3) using empirical score distributions among matches and nonmatches to perform Bayesian adjustment of matching probabilities estimated from exact-agreement linkage. In experiments on holdout data, as well as data simulated with varying name error rates and supporting fields, a logistic regression classifier incorporated via the Bayesian method demonstrated marked improvements over exact-agreement linkage with respect to discriminatory power, match probability estimation, and accuracy, reducing the total number of misclassified record pairs by 21% in test data and up to an average of 93% in simulated datasets. Our results demonstrate the value of incorporating visual, phonetic, and keystroke similarity for logographic name matching, as well as the promise of our Bayesian approach to leverage name-matching within large-scale record linkage.