HybridSB-MoE: Dual-Domain Schrödinger Bridges with Scene-Adaptive Expert Routing for Speech Enhancement

Generative speech enhancement faces three gaps: spectral models capture harmonic structure but often disrupt phase, waveform models preserve phase but miss harmonics, and Schrödinger Bridges (SB) shorten transport from noise to clean speech but leave inference cost only loosely tied to training. We propose HybridSB-MoE, a dual-domain framework that fills these gaps through three contributions unified by a single asymmetric design principle. (i) Asymmetric uncertainty fusion: The spectral path captures epistemic uncertainty via expert disagreement, while the waveform bridge models aleatoric variance through stochastic dynamics. We fuse them asymmetrically, allowing the mixing weight to adapt to distinct error regimes rather than average predictions. (ii) Heterogeneous MoE with top-k=2 routing across five distinct architectural archetypes, where architectural diversity makes the epistemic signal indicate which inductive bias fails rather than small perturbations among similar experts. (iii) Discretization bound (Theorem 1): path-consistency and trajectory regularizers together bound the K-step bridge sampling error in 2-Wasserstein distance at rate K-alpha, making small-K inference an objective-level guarantee rather than an empirical claim. On VoiceBank+DEMAND, HybridSB-MoE outperforms diffusion- and SB-based baselines at their step budgets while remaining competitive with consistency-distilled few-step methods.

RAG-X: Systematic Diagnosis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering

Automated question-answering (QA) systems increasingly rely on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to ground large language models (LLMs) in authoritative medical knowledge, ensuring clinical accuracy and patient safety in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare. Despite progress in RAG evaluation, current benchmarks focus only on simple multiple-choice QA tasks and employ metrics that poorly capture the semantic precision required for complex QA tasks. These approaches fail to diagnose whether an error stems from faulty retrieval or flawed generation, limiting developers from performing targeted improvement. To address this gap, we propose RAG-X, a diagnostic framework that evaluates the retriever and generator independently across a triad of QA tasks: information extraction, short-answer generation, and multiple-choice question (MCQ) answering. RAG-X introduces Context Utilization Efficiency (CUE) metrics to disaggregate system success into interpretable quadrants, isolating verified grounding from deceptive accuracy. Our experiments reveal an ``Accuracy Fallacy", where a 14\% gap separates perceived system success from evidence-based grounding. By surfacing hidden failure modes, RAG-X offers the diagnostic transparency needed for safe and verifiable clinical RAG systems.