Measuring and Mitigating Toxicity in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Replication Study

Large Language Models (LLMs), when trained on web-scale corpora, inherently absorb toxic patterns from their training data. This leads to ``toxic degeneration'' where even innocuous prompts can trigger harmful outputs. This phenomenon poses significant risks for real-world deployments. Thus, necessitating effective mitigation strategies that should maintain model utility while ensuring safety. In this comprehensive replication study, we evaluate the efficacy of \textbf{DExperts} (Decoding-time Experts), which is an inference-time mitigation technique that steers generation without requiring model retraining. We structured our research into three systematic phases: (1) establishing baseline toxicity measurements using \textbf{RealToxicityPrompts} on standard GPT-2 models; then (2) implementing and evaluating DExperts to mitigate explicit toxicity; and finally (3) stress-testing the method against implicit hate speech using the adversarial \textbf{ToxiGen} dataset. Our empirical results confirm that while DExperts achieves near-perfect safety rates (100\%) on explicit toxicity benchmarks, it exhibits brittleness against adversarial, implicit hate speech, with safety rates dropping to 98.5\%. Furthermore, we quantify a critical trade-off. The method introduces a $\sim$10x latency penalty (from 0.2s to 2.0s per generation), posing challenges for real-time deployment scenarios. This study contributes to the growing body of work on AI safety by highlighting the robustness gap between explicit and implicit toxicity mitigation. We emphasize the need for more sophisticated approaches that generalize across diverse hate speech patterns without prohibitive computational costs.

Leveraging CNNs and Ensemble Learning for Automated Disaster Image Classification

Natural disasters act as a serious threat globally, requiring effective and efficient disaster management and recovery. This paper focuses on classifying natural disaster images using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Multiple CNN architectures were built and trained on a dataset containing images of earthquakes, floods, wildfires, and volcanoes. A stacked CNN ensemble approach proved to be the most effective, achieving 95% accuracy and an F1 score going up to 0.96 for individual classes. Tuning hyperparameters of individual models for optimization was critical to maximize the models' performance. The stacking of CNNs with XGBoost acting as the meta-model utilizes the strengths of the CNN and ResNet models to improve the overall accuracy of the classification. Results obtained from the models illustrated the potency of CNN-based models for automated disaster image classification. This lays the foundation for expanding these techniques to build robust systems for disaster response, damage assessment, and recovery management.