Statistical Mechanics of Dynamical System Identification

Recovering dynamical equations from observed noisy data is the central challenge of system identification. We develop a statistical mechanical approach to analyze sparse equation discovery algorithms, which typically balance data fit and parsimony through a trial-and-error selection of hyperparameters. In this framework, statistical mechanics offers tools to analyze the interplay between complexity and fitness, in analogy to that done between entropy and energy. To establish this analogy, we define the optimization procedure as a two-level Bayesian inference problem that separates variable selection from coefficient values and enables the computation of the posterior parameter distribution in closed form. A key advantage of employing statistical mechanical concepts, such as free energy and the partition function, is in the quantification of uncertainty, especially in in the low-data limit; frequently encountered in real-world applications. As the data volume increases, our approach mirrors the thermodynamic limit, leading to distinct sparsity- and noise-induced phase transitions that delineate correct from incorrect identification. This perspective of sparse equation discovery, is versatile and can be adapted to various other equation discovery algorithms.

Data-Induced Interactions of Sparse Sensors

Large-dimensional empirical data in science and engineering frequently has low-rank structure and can be represented as a combination of just a few eigenmodes. Because of this structure, we can use just a few spatially localized sensor measurements to reconstruct the full state of a complex system. The quality of this reconstruction, especially in the presence of sensor noise, depends significantly on the spatial configuration of the sensors. Multiple algorithms based on gappy interpolation and QR factorization have been proposed to optimize sensor placement. Here, instead of an algorithm that outputs a singular "optimal" sensor configuration, we take a thermodynamic view to compute the full landscape of sensor interactions induced by the training data. The landscape takes the form of the Ising model in statistical physics, and accounts for both the data variance captured at each sensor location and the crosstalk between sensors. Mapping out these data-induced sensor interactions allows combining them with external selection criteria and anticipating sensor replacement impacts.