Can LLM Teams Play What? Where? When?

Large language models (LLMs) remain limited on tasks requiring indirect reasoning, cultural knowledge, and coordinated hypothesis testing. We investigate whether team-based interaction improves LLM performance in What? Where? When? (ChGK), a quiz game designed to reward collective reasoning. We introduce three team strategies: Voting, Silent Team (the captain observes final answers), and Talkative Team (the captain observes both answers and rationales). To minimize data leakage, we evaluate these strategies on a dataset consisting of 572 ChGK questions released in 2025. Using six recent large-scale open models, we show that team-based strategies outperform single-model baselines, yielding gains of up to 20 percentage points in accuracy. The best team achieves 44.23% accuracy, and approaches human team performance on questions with available human statistics. Analysis of inter-model diversity reveals that disagreement strongly predicts lower accuracy, but explanatory communication substantially mitigates performance drops. We further examine captain behavior and find no evidence of self-preference bias; access to peer rationales improves captain judgments. Overall, LLM teams function primarily as answer selection and error-filtering mechanisms rather than generators of novel solutions. Our findings highlight the importance of interaction and suggest adaptive strategies as a promising direction for multi-agent systems.

Lexicon-based Methods vs. BERT for Text Sentiment Analysis

The performance of sentiment analysis methods has greatly increased in recent years. This is due to the use of various models based on the Transformer architecture, in particular BERT. However, deep neural network models are difficult to train and poorly interpretable. An alternative approach is rule-based methods using sentiment lexicons. They are fast, require no training, and are well interpreted. But recently, due to the widespread use of deep learning, lexicon-based methods have receded into the background. The purpose of the article is to study the performance of the SO-CAL and SentiStrength lexicon-based methods, adapted for the Russian language. We have tested these methods, as well as the RuBERT neural network model, on 16 text corpora and have analyzed their results. RuBERT outperforms both lexicon-based methods on average, but SO-CAL surpasses RuBERT for four corpora out of 16.