What to Preserve, Where to Adapt: A Depth-Wise Analysis of Forgetting in Continual Gynecological Image Segmentation

Medical image segmentation models are typically trained under the assumption that all data are available simultaneously. However, in clinical practice, datasets often arrive sequentially, requiring models to adapt continuously to evolving data distributions. We study this problem in gynecological image segmentation, where substantial heterogeneity across imaging modalities, anatomical structures, and annotation protocols creates a particularly challenging continual learning setting. Under these large distribution shifts, existing continual learning methods struggle to preserve previously learned knowledge, leading to catastrophic forgetting. To better understand forgetting in this setting, we investigate how different encoder--decoder regions influence segmentation performance and forgetting during continual gynecological segmentation. Through block-wise ablation analysis, we observe that ablating early encoder and late decoder regions results in the largest performance degradation, indicating that segmentation performance depends unevenly across the network hierarchy. Using controlled adaptation experiments, we further show that forgetting remains limited when updates are restricted to bottleneck-adjacent regions, but increases sharply once shallower encoders and decoders become trainable, even when only a small subset of parameters is updated. These findings suggest that forgetting in the encoder-decoder architecture is strongly influenced by where updates occur across network depth during continual learning. Full code and analysis pipelines will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Tasks

Deep reasoning is fundamental for solving complex tasks, especially in vision-centric scenarios that demand sequential, multimodal understanding. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate agents with fully synthetic, single-turn queries, limited visual modalities, and lack a framework to assess reasoning quality over multiple steps as required in real-world settings. To address this, we introduce Agent-X, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating vision-centric agents multi-step and deep reasoning capabilities in real-world, multimodal settings. Agent- X features 828 agentic tasks with authentic visual contexts, including images, multi-image comparisons, videos, and instructional text. These tasks span six major agentic environments: general visual reasoning, web browsing, security and surveillance, autonomous driving, sports, and math reasoning. Our benchmark requires agents to integrate tool use with explicit, stepwise decision-making in these diverse settings. In addition, we propose a fine-grained, step-level evaluation framework that assesses the correctness and logical coherence of each reasoning step and the effectiveness of tool usage throughout the task. Our results reveal that even the best-performing models, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen families, struggle to solve multi-step vision tasks, achieving less than 50% full-chain success. These findings highlight key bottlenecks in current LMM reasoning and tool-use capabilities and identify future research directions in vision-centric agentic reasoning models. Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/Agent-X