Abstract:The Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MT-TSP) seeks a minimum cost trajectory for an agent that departs from a static depot, visits a set of moving targets, each within one of their assigned time windows, and returns to the depot. In this article, we study the Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem with Moving Obstacles (MT-TSP-MO), a generalization of the MT-TSP where the agent trajectory must avoid moving obstacles. We present a Mixed-Integer Conic Programming (MICP) formulation that can be solved using off-the-shelf solvers, as well as a fast and scalable Two-Phase Bilevel Search (TPBS) algorithm that computes high-quality feasible solutions for the problem. We evaluate our approaches against an existing baseline algorithm on a broad range of problem instances with up to 40 targets and 40 obstacles. The results demonstrate that both the proposed methods significantly outperform the baseline with respect to success rates, solution costs, and computation time.
Abstract:The Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MT-TSP) aims to find a shortest path for an agent that starts at a stationary depot, visits a set of moving targets exactly once, each within one of their respective time windows, and then returns to the depot. In this paper, we introduce a new Mixed-Integer Conic Program (MICP) formulation that finds the optimum for the Multi-Agent Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MA-MT-TSP), a generalization of the MT-TSP involving multiple agents. We obtain our formulation by first restating the current state-of-the-art MICP formulation for MA-MT-TSP as a Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Nonconvex Program, and then reformulating it as a new MICP. We present computational results to demonstrate the performance of our approach. The results show that our formulation significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art, with up to a two-order-of-magnitude reduction in runtime, and up to over 90% tighter optimality gap.




Abstract:This paper introduces a new formulation that finds the optimum for the Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MT-TSP), which seeks to find a shortest path for an agent, that starts at a depot, visits a set of moving targets exactly once within their assigned time-windows, and returns to the depot. The formulation relies on the key idea that when the targets move along lines, their trajectories become convex sets within the space-time coordinate system. The problem then reduces to finding the shortest path within a graph of convex sets, subject to some speed constraints. We compare our formulation with the current state-of-the-art Mixed Integer Conic Program (MICP) solver for the MT-TSP. The experimental results show that our formulation outperforms the MICP for instances with up to 20 targets, with up to two orders of magnitude reduction in runtime, and up to a 60\% tighter optimality gap. We also show that the solution cost from the convex relaxation of our formulation provides significantly tighter lower bounds for the MT-TSP than the ones from the MICP.
Abstract:We introduce a new bounding approach called Continuity* (C*) that provides optimality guarantees to the Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MT-TSP). Our approach relies on relaxing the continuity constraints on the agent's tour. This is done by partitioning the targets' trajectories into small sub-segments and allowing the agent to arrive at any point in one of the sub-segments and depart from any point in the same sub-segment when visiting each target. This lets us pose the bounding problem as a Generalized Traveling Salesman Problem (GTSP) in a graph where the cost of traveling an edge requires us to solve a new problem called the Shortest Feasible Travel (SFT). We also introduce C*-lite, which follows the same approach as C*, but uses simple and easy to compute lower-bounds to the SFT. We first prove that the proposed algorithms provide lower bounds to the MT-TSP. We also provide computational results to corroborate the performance of C* and C*-lite for instances with up to 15 targets. For the special case where targets travel along lines, we compare our C* variants with the SOCP based method, which is the current state-of-the-art solver for MT-TSP. While the SOCP based method performs well for instances with 5 and 10 targets, C* outperforms the SOCP based method for instances with 15 targets. For the general case, on average, our approaches find feasible solutions within ~4% of the lower bounds for the tested instances.