Fuzzy Accuracy Compensates for Label Subjectivity in Classification of Skin Tone Using Wearable Photoplethysmography Signals

We consider the problem of classification of skin tone using photoplethysmography (PPG) signals with labels of the ordinal six-class Fitzpatrick skin tones. A typical accuracy for this task is a poor 40-55 %. However, the labels are subjectively determined by comparing the skin with a colour chart, and hence contain widespread small-scale inaccuracies. By working with a "fuzzy accuracy", which deems a prediction of skin tone class to be correct if its difference from the labelled class is not greater than one, much higher accuracy is obtained which provides more convincing evidence that skin tone can be accurately predicted from PPG signals. Three machine learning approaches were used, namely deep learning or tree-based approaches on raw PPG signals, deep learning on image representations of the signals generated by the Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) method, and machine learning on features extracted from the signals. The first method also employed a fuzzy version of the cross entropy loss function, which gave the best results. Tree-based models on raw signals give accuracies up to 55 % and higher fuzzy accuracies up to 96 %, while deep learning models on the SPAR images obtained lower results of 44 % accuracy and 85 % fuzzy accuracy. The machine learning on PPG features gave similar results to the SPAR method with accuracy of 42 % and fuzzy accuracy of 87 %. We have shown that classification of skin tone using PPG signals is possible with high fuzzy accuracy which implies that our modelling approach enables accurate prediction of skin tone class within at most one class of the observer's choice of class, from which we conclude that PPG signals are affected by skin tone in a discernible way.

ECG Feature Importance Rankings: Cardiologists vs. Algorithms

Feature importance methods promise to provide a ranking of features according to importance for a given classification task. A wide range of methods exist but their rankings often disagree and they are inherently difficult to evaluate due to a lack of ground truth beyond synthetic datasets. In this work, we put feature importance methods to the test on real-world data in the domain of cardiology, where we try to distinguish three specific pathologies from healthy subjects based on ECG features comparing to features used in cardiologists' decision rules as ground truth. Some methods generally performed well and others performed poorly, while some methods did well on some but not all of the problems considered.