Fair Benchmarking of Emerging One-Step Generative Models Against Multistep Diffusion and Flow Models

State-of-the-art text-to-image models produce high-quality images, but inference remains expensive as generation requires several sequential ODE or denoising steps. Native one-step models aim to reduce this cost by mapping noise to an image in a single step, yet fair comparisons to multi-step systems are difficult because studies use mismatched sampling steps and different classifier-free guidance (CFG) settings, where CFG can shift FID, Inception Score, and CLIP-based alignment in opposing directions. It is also unclear how well one-step models scale to multi-step inference, and there is limited standardized out-of-distribution evaluation for label-ID-conditioned generators beyond ImageNet. To address this, We benchmark eight models spanning one-step flows (MeanFlow, Improved MeanFlow, SoFlow), multi-step baselines (RAE, Scale-RAE), and established systems (SiT, Stable Diffusion 3.5, FLUX.1) under a controlled class-conditional protocol on ImageNet validation, ImageNetV2, and reLAIONet, our new proofread out-of-distribution dataset aligned to ImageNet label IDs. Using FID, Inception Score, CLIP Score, and Pick Score, we show that FID-focused model development and CFG selection can be misleading in few-step regimes, where guidance changes can improve FID while degrading text-image alignment and human preference signals and worsening perceived quality. We further show that leading one-step models benefit from step scaling and become substantially more competitive under multi-step inference, although they still exhibit characteristic local distortions. To capture these tradeoffs, we introduce MinMax Harmonic Mean (MMHM), a composite proxy over all four metrics that stabilizes hyperparameter selection across guidance and step sweeps.

Single-Slice-to-3D Reconstruction in Medical Imaging and Natural Objects: A Comparative Benchmark with SAM 3D

A 3D understanding of anatomy is central to diagnosis and treatment planning, yet volumetric imaging remains costly with long wait times. Image-to-3D foundations models can solve this issue by reconstructing 3D data from 2D modalites. Current foundation models are trained on natural image distributions to reconstruct naturalistic objects from a single image by leveraging geometric priors across pixels. However, it is unclear whether these learned geometric priors transfer to medical data. In this study, we present a controlled zero-shot benchmark of single slice medical image-to-3D reconstruction across five state-of-the-art image-to-3D models: SAM3D, Hunyuan3D-2.1, Direct3D, Hi3DGen, and TripoSG. These are evaluated across six medical datasets spanning anatomical and pathological structures and two natrual datasets, using voxel based metrics and point cloud distance metrics. Across medical datasets, voxel based overlap remains moderate for all models, consistent with a depth reconstruction failure mode when inferring volume from a single slice. In contrast, global distance metrics show more separation between methods: SAM3D achieves the strongest overall topological similarity to ground truth medical 3D data, while alternative models are more prone to over-simplication of reconstruction. Our results quantify the limits of single-slice medical reconstruction and highlight depth ambiguity caused by the planar nature of 2D medical data, motivating multi-view image-to-3D reconstruction to enable reliable medical 3D inference.