OptiAgent: End-to-End Optimization Modeling via Multi-Agent Iterative Refinement

We propose OptiAgent, a multi-agent framework that, given a natural language description of an Operations Research problem, is able to output a solver-ready mathematical formulation as well as executable code. Our architecture prioritizes the mathematical modeling step, where dedicated agents extract structures, such as decision variables and constraints, enabling iterative self-correction. We introduce a novel multi-loop validation architecture with four specialized feedback mechanisms, each targeting a distinct failure mode such as misinterpretation, structural defects, mathematical inconsistencies, validation failures, and code errors. Alongside accuracy, our modular design improves the process of solving optimization problems by improving transparency, as each agent exposes its reasoning and feedback, making the full modeling process auditable. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on 3 out of 4 benchmarks across LP, MILP, and Nonlinear Programming tasks, while remaining highly competitive on the remaining dataset.

Evaluating Black-Box Vulnerabilities with Wasserstein-Constrained Data Perturbations

The massive use of Machine Learning (ML) tools in industry comes with critical challenges, such as the lack of explainable models and the use of black-box algorithms. We address this issue by applying Optimal Transport theory in the analysis of responses of ML models to variations in the distribution of input variables. We find the closest distribution, in the Wasserstein sense, that satisfies a given constraintt and examine its impact on model behavior. Furthermore, we establish convergence results for this projected distribution and demonstrate our approach using examples and real-world datasets in both regression and classification settings.

Exposing the Illusion of Fairness: Auditing Vulnerabilities to Distributional Manipulation Attacks

Proving the compliance of AI algorithms has become an important challenge with the growing deployment of such algorithms for real-life applications. Inspecting possible biased behaviors is mandatory to satisfy the constraints of the regulations of the EU Artificial Intelligence's Act. Regulation-driven audits increasingly rely on global fairness metrics, with Disparate Impact being the most widely used. Yet such global measures depend highly on the distribution of the sample on which the measures are computed. We investigate first how to manipulate data samples to artificially satisfy fairness criteria, creating minimally perturbed datasets that remain statistically indistinguishable from the original distribution while satisfying prescribed fairness constraints. Then we study how to detect such manipulation. Our analysis (i) introduces mathematically sound methods for modifying empirical distributions under fairness constraints using entropic or optimal transport projections, (ii) examines how an auditee could potentially circumvent fairness inspections, and (iii) offers recommendations to help auditors detect such data manipulations. These results are validated through experiments on classical tabular datasets in bias detection.