Policy Improvement from Multiple Experts

Despite its promise, reinforcement learning's real-world adoption has been hampered by its need for costly exploration to learn a good policy. Imitation learning (IL) mitigates this shortcoming by using an expert policy during training as a bootstrap to accelerate the learning process. However, in many practical situations, the learner has access to multiple suboptimal experts, which may provide conflicting advice in a state. The existing IL literature provides a limited treatment of such scenarios. Whereas in the single-expert case, the return of the expert's policy provides an obvious benchmark for the learner to compete against, neither such a benchmark nor principled ways of outperforming it are known for the multi-expert setting. In this paper, we propose the state-wise maximum of the expert policies' values as a natural baseline to resolve conflicting advice from multiple experts. Using a reduction of policy optimization to online learning, we introduce a novel IL algorithm MAMBA, which can provably learn a policy competitive with this benchmark. In particular, MAMBA optimizes policies by using a gradient estimator in the style of generalized advantage estimation (GAE). Our theoretical analysis shows that this design makes MAMBA robust and enables it to outperform the expert policies by a larger margin than IL state of the art, even in the single-expert case. In an evaluation against standard policy gradient with GAE and AggreVaTeD, we showcase MAMBA's ability to leverage demonstrations both from a single and from multiple weak experts, and significantly speed up policy optimization.