This correspondence points out a technical error in Proposition 4 of the paper [1]. Because of this error, the proofs of Lemma 3, Theorem 1, Theorem 3, Proposition 2, and Theorem 4 in that paper are no longer valid. We provide counterexamples to Proposition 4 and discuss where the flaw in its proof lies. We also provide numerical evidence indicating that Lemma 3, Theorem 1, and Proposition 2 are likely to be false. Since the proof of Theorem 4 depends on the validity of Proposition 4, we propose an amendment to the statement of Theorem 4 of the paper using convergence in operator norm and prove this rigorously. In addition, we also provide a construction that guarantees convergence in the sense of Proposition 4.